This writing will explore the two faces of Eros and Logos. These two faces or aspects indicate that the eros and logos are “Janus-faced”, and their aspects involve some duplicity when involved in the day-to-day lives of human beings. The duplicity is the manner in which both Psyche and Eros deal with truth as revealing and the bringing into the light and the hiding or concealment of truth in our experience of the reality of world.
The soul, Psyche, is wed to Eros and is composed, according to Plato, of the logistikon (head), the thymoeides (heart), and the epithymetikon (appetites, gut). Eros may be said to be concerned with the ontical or the material and the concrete, that which is physical and accessible or revealed through the senses. Logos is concerned with the ontological or the manner of being of human beings within language, either as word or number i.e. the “knowledge” that gives rise to the politics and the ethics that come-to-be as a result of the challenging Eros upon human beings so that our lives are ones of ordering that which is revealed through the various parts of the soul and how that which is revealed comes to its essence. This ordering revealing stance gives the world to us as “data” and is what we call “information”. “Information” is that which is responsible for the ‘form’ (ordering, gathering) so that it may ‘inform’. The data must report in a way that makes whatever is revealed compatible with the ‘form’ for the ‘form’ rules in the ordering of the data. The ‘informing’ is possible through the form in which the data is brought to light and revealed as a ‘resource’. This ordering gathering is what we call technology.
Though Eros and Psyche are wed to each other, they are not Identical. We can say that they are the Same and their relationship distinguishes what we mean by the Identical and the Same. Also, in saying that Logos and Eros have two faces, we are nevertheless insisting that both are one just as the tripartite soul is a one or individual. If we count up the parts, they will total 7. Plato’s drama Symposium has seven speakers and the drama itself reflects the nature of the human soul.
The tripartite soul of Plato can be held in contrast to the tripartite theory of the “person” of Sigmund Freud. For Freud the id, ego, and superego compose the concrete reality of the human psyche, the persona, the “personality”. In Freud, there are no souls. Love, for Freud, is blind and is a matter of contingency and chance. For Plato, Love and the Intelligence are connected in the essential human activity of revealing truth and of living well in communities, how we participate in justice, and what we are “fitted” for as human beings. The dialectical or ‘conversational friendship’ that is the essence of the Platonic relationship of the soul with the presence-at-hand of ‘the other’ that leads to the perfection that is its proper end is mirrored in Freudian psychotherapy by the relationship between the therapist/analyst and the patient which, hopefully, leads to “good mental health”. For both, the end is eudaemonia or “happiness”, “good spirits”. Whereas Freud sees human beings as “persons” (“masks”) and ids or “its”, Plato sees human beings as “souls”. Where Freud sees the essence of sacred love as profane, Diotima in Symposium sees that what we understand as profane love is, in its essence, sacred. This is what is meant here when we say that through our natural desire or urge for procreation or giving birth to children, we are showing our desire for the Incarnation, for immortality.
Plato’s tripartite soul consists of the logistikon (reason, thought, nous which has to do with the head), the thymoeides (spiritedness, that which houses anger, hate, care, concern and love as well as the other “spirited” emotions which has to do with the heart), and the epithymetikon (appetite or desire, which houses the desire for physical pleasures, the desire for “possession” and “consumption” which has to do with the gut and genitalia).
While for Plato the ’embodied soul’ of the human being is a three, it is also a ‘one’. Since each part of the soul is ‘two-faced’, the three parts combine with the one to produce a seven. Human society, our culture and politics, are the institutions and conventions that mirror the three parts of the soul, each type of regime or institution from which they originate highlighting an aspect of the human soul the development of which through education will bring about what is conceived as human “excellence” or “virtue”, what the Greeks called arete, within that society. It is the political regime which the community has chosen or which rules in the community that creates the character of the human beings who live within that regime and the “culture” of the worlds in which those human beings will be immersed. It is the political regime that is ultimately the determiner of the ethics or the actions of the members of that regime. For the ancients, religion and the state, the ethics and the politics, were not distinct. This must be kept in mind when trying to understand what is currently occurring in regimes throughout the world. “Human excellence” is not a matter of taste or fashion.
The sub-title of Symposium by Plato is “On the Good”. The coming to be of technology as a way of being-in-the-world has required changes in what we think is good, what we think the good is, how we conceive sanity and madness, justice and injustice, rationality and irrationality, beauty and ugliness. The word “technology” in its unique combining of the Greek words technē and logos illustrates the “two-faced” character of its etymological roots: “knowing”(logos) and “making” (technē).
“Making” is a kind of “procreation”, but unlike Nature’s “procreation” which is from within itself, technology’s “procreation” is “in another and for another”. Nature’s procreation is presence-at-hand and we apprehend it through our viewing of the beauty of the world in the flight of a butterfly or the awe we feel in the presence of some natural phenomenon such as Niagara Falls. Technology’s procreation is the ready-to-hand world that gives and views the “other” as “resource”, as “data”.
This technological bringing forth was called poiesis by the Greeks, and our word “poetry” is derived from this word. Poiesis is a “bringing forth”; technology is also a bringing forth, but they are not the same. The “bringing-forth” that is technology is the eros that is present in both the arts and the sciences, and this bringing-forth, this pro-duction, is what we call ‘knowledge’. The poiesis of technology is distinct from that of poetry, and this distinction is indicated in its use of “imagination” or eikasia as illustrated by Plato in his Divided Line in Bk VI of his Republic. The eikasia or imagination is shown in that which is present in the bringing-forth that is the technology of the technicians and it is distinguished from that bringing-forth that is the work of the true poets.
How does technology become the anti-Eros and the anti-Logos that it is in the modern age? Or perhaps we may question: how does technology show itself as one of the faces of the Janus-faced entities that we call eros and logos? The writer J. R. R. Tolkien once referred to technology as “black magic”. “Magic” is the attempt to control human beings’ relation to the divine as well as to Necessity, and the colour black is indicative of the lack of revealing light. “Magic” is a form of hubris and is condemned as such. While technology is able to reveal Necessity with great affect, it cannot do so with the divine. It is the mastering, commandeering urge or desire of technology in its ordering (which is but one face of eros) that distinguishes it from the Eros that leads upward. The other face of eros leads in the other direction towards the material and virtual worlds that technology creates.
The nearing and the withdrawal of the gods is related to humanity’s relation to being, and this is indicative of our relationship to Eros. The ‘bringing forth’ and ‘revealing’ that is manifested in technology’s relation to the world requires an indifference towards the things that are in their reality. The gods make themselves known through their “revelatory” relations to human beings which are dependent on the Logos (the Ten Commandments, as an example). It is not up to human beings to decide whether the divine will reveal itself. The role of human beings is simply to be prepared for the possibilities of such revelations through the calling and the hearing. The attempts by human beings to control and commandeer the gods causes the gods to withdraw into concealment. An example can be shown in the discoveries of the James Webb Telescope: as the furthest extents of the universe are revealed, the god simultaneously withdraws from that revealing.
Both Eros and the Logos contain within themselves the potential for the complete destruction of human beings but also the potential for their redemption and salvation. Both the Logos and Eros are present in the human soul simultaneously. If the essence of human being is in our capacity to reveal truth, if we are the being that reveals (eros) through language (logos), the zoon logon echon: the living being that perdures in language, then we as human beings may potentially lose our essence and become less human, more inhumane, if we do not do so. When we do not do so, the world about us becomes ‘soulless’ and Eros takes flight because that which he loves, the most Beautiful of mortals Psyche, has ceased to respond to him. The world becomes, essentially, ‘unerotic’ and we ourselves are in danger of becoming somnambulistic zombies.
Our challenging demand that the world reveal itself in such a way that it can be placed within “the form that informs” as ‘resource’ are both aspects of one face of eros and the logos. This challenging demanding arises from our desire to possess and consume, a desire that arises from within the epithymetikon part of the soul. In the story of The Garden of Eden, it is Eve’s eating of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil that brings about the fall of human beings. It is a ‘grasping’ and ‘consumption’. Due to this fall, human beings must survive by the sweat of their brows, by their work. It is this knowledge that our very survival depends on our procuring efforts that brings about the anxiety of insecurity, and the procurement of goods allays this anxiety. The coming to presence that is technology gives to human beings a way which allows the revealing of eros to the Otherness which human beings can neither invent nor make so that human beings come to perceive this Otherness as ‘resource’ so that human beings will feel “secure” and more “at home” in this Otherness.
With the coming-to-be of Artificial Intelligence, there is the danger that all the revealing of eros will be consumed in the ‘form’ that ‘informs’ so that all that is present must reveal itself as data that must be transformed into usable “information”, to ‘resource’. The data that resists such transformation will be overlooked as meaningless and ignored. There is much in this writing, for example, which AI will ignore as the data cannot be transformed into a useable resource.
With this situation, Eros takes flight. We as human beings become lost in our attempts to master and control technology because we see technology (and Artificial Intelligence) as an instrument or tool that we can commandeer in our modes of revealing. How our understanding of technology as instrument has come to pass through our understanding of the world as guided by the principle of reason is illustrative of our essence as human beings which is to reveal truth through the logos. This ambiguity lets us see the mystery of all revealing, of truth, as our participation in the presence of eros and the logos in every waking moment of our everyday lives.
The challenging forth that is the manner of revealing of one side of the face of Eros is counter-balanced by the revealing as bringing forth that the Greeks understood as poiesis. The distinction between the two is indicated by Plato in his Divided Line in Bk VI of Republic. The two exist side-by-side, but the challenging forth manner of revealing that is to be found in technology blocks the Eros who shows himself in the revealing as poiesis.
The revealing of the world as resource blocks the revealing of the world through poiesis because the revealing of the world as resource demands that nature respond to the form that it has imposed so that what is revealed may inform. The logos and the eros perdure in their standing side-by-side just as the revealing of the world that is done through the logistikon can manifest itself in either the logos that is the commandeering calculation of the form that informs or through the logos that poetically reveals that world to us. The role of the logistikon in the thinking involved in commandeering calculation (the principle of reason), the thinking that reveals itself to us in our sciences, and the thinking involved in our revealing of the beauty of the world that is found in our poetry (or all true language) exist together simultaneously in our being-in-the-world. Our fondness for acronyms indicates that language is eroded, decayed and deadened in the world that is dominated by the logos of commandeering calculation.
In Plato, the essence of what human beings are is the soul, and this is manifested in their actions through their being possessed by the logos and eros. Notice that I did not say that they are ‘possessed of’. The Otherness that is Nature is sempiternal: that which permanently endures in Nature and as Nature is Necessity. Human beings are ’embodied souls’. In being so, they share in that permanence and change that is manifested in Nature. They are subject to Necessity in all their being except for that infinitesimal part of the soul that is beyond Necessity and makes their being in language and longing possible.
The Ideas of Plato give birth to the eidos or the ‘outward appearances of things’. The Ideas and the eidos are not the Same nor are they Identical. The things in their outward appearance do not reveal their essence. In their ‘shining’ as ‘presence’, they reveal the eros that is present in all beings that exist, but they reveal themselves as only ‘shadows’. These ‘shadows’ become replicated in the representations of the thinking of human beings that bring forth the ‘produce’ that technicians and ordinary poets carry out in their day-to-day activities.
The essence of Nature is its manner of perduring as Necessity through all of its apparent changes on the surface. The eidos reveal to us this manner of perduring. The ethical being of human beings, the actions that human beings engage in (what is called their ‘ontology’), reveal their essence through all of the multivarious changes in those actions. Human excellence or arete is revealed through the highest actions of human beings and these become models for those that follow. These ‘highest actions’ are not matters of taste nor subject to the whims of the times.
Logos and Eros are in constant strife with each other, for the logos attempts to put forward those frames of reference that make eros understandable and so provide our ‘understanding’ of the world we experience as we experience it and what its essence is, while the eros constantly urges a moving on from that which wants to find itself permanently settled in the flux that is human existence. While the logos strives for the stable and the settled, the ‘ordered’, eros strives for the ‘novel’ and the ‘new’. Eros is messy. Both of these strivings come to human beings from ‘beyond’ the being that is humanity itself.
Eros and Logos are coupled together in the impenetrable mystery that is Being and Becoming, or as the poet William Blake would say: “The human form Divine”. The poetical brings the true as the revealing that is present in Eros and in the Logos into the splendour of “that which shines forth most purely” (Phaedrus). Eros is present and pervades all bringing-forth or ‘production’ that is the coming to presence into the beautiful. The logos is present as the techne, that ‘know how’ that allows us to be at home in our worlds and provides us with our understanding and meaning of those worlds. It gives us our ‘faith’ and ‘trust’ in those worlds (see Plato’s Divided Line).
William Blake
However, the logos when understood purely as techne strives to view art as ‘aesthetic’ only, that is as a ‘calculable’ thing in its historicity. This aesthetic-mindedness kills what we may learn from the art; it kills eros. Our faith and trust become ossified in the principle of reason that is one face of the two-faced Logos, so much so that Eros flees and we are left bereft of that revealing that is our essential nature as human beings. We dwell in the condition that is somnambulism, what William Blake refers to as “Newton’s sleep”.
Eros, Logos and World as “Information”: “Information” as the Essence of Technology
In our modern age, the world is given to us as “data” which we then transform into “information”. This “giving” is the work of Eros; the transforming is the work of the Logos. We may understand the meaning of information as ‘that which is responsible for the form so that it may inform’. The ‘form’ is what the Greeks called eidos, the outward appearance of a thing. We have shown that one of the aspects of eros is that of the ‘outward appearance’s’ coming to presence and enduring as the beautiful. This coming to presence and enduring is ‘truth’, and truth as essence is a revealing from hiddenness which is done in the ‘shining’ of Eros as the beautiful.
If the essence of “information” is that which is responsible for the ‘form’ that ‘informs’, that which is as ‘data’ can only respond in the way that the challenging command of the ‘form’ allows that data to come to presence as that which may ‘inform’ as ‘resource’. The essence of the challenging is one of the faces of Eros. The truth that is revealed from the coming to presence of the form itself hides the essence of ‘information’ as the essence of technology. The entrapping of world as data disguises itself in its setting in order everything that presences, all of which we perceive as data, as resource and establishes itself as ‘resource’ and rules all that is regarded as ‘resource’. This is the essence of Artificial Intelligence; and AI may be said to be the apogee of technology.
The danger of AI is not that some day machines may come to think for themselves and, as imagined in the film The Terminator, come to destroy human beings. The very danger of AI lies rather in the construction of this image itself: that as long as we view technology as a means, or as an instrument or piece of equipment, or a tool rather than that form that allows instruments, equipment and tools to come into being makes us unaware that technology is now ordering how the coming to presence of human beings will be conducted and revealed. Some of us may be reminded of the words of T. S. Eliot from his poem “The Hollow Men”: “This is the way the world ends/ This is the way the world ends/ This is the way the world ends/ Not with a bang but a whimper”.
It is Eros that must rescue human beings from this danger; for it is Eros, both in its coupling with the Logos in its giving the coming to presence of being itself and in its coupling with the revealing of truth as the beautiful through that light that is his essence, that is responsible for the true ordering of the essence of human beings. This rescue will be carried out through Eros as Love.
#14 The Illuminating Intelligence: Letter Shin Alef Mem with the element of Shin emphasized (Red)
#15 The Stabilizing Intelligence: Letter Tet (Green)
#17 Intelligence of the Senses: Letter Vav (Orange)
#13 The Unity Directing Intelligence Letter: Peh (Purple)
The Third Path is the Sanctifying Intelligence, and is the basis of foundation of Primordial Wisdom, which is called the Former of faith, and its roots, Amen; and it is the parent of Faith, from which virtues doth Faith emanate.
Alt. Trans. “The third path is called the sanctifying consciousness. It is the foundation of primordial wisdom and is called “enduring faith [Amen]”, and its roots are truth [Amen]. It is the father of trust [Amen], from which the power of faith [Amen] emanates.”
Wescott trans. The Third Path is the Sanctifying Intelligence, and is the foundation of Primordial wisdom, which is called the Creator of Faith, and its roots are AMN; and it is the parent of Faith, from which doth Faith emanate.
Path 3. Sanctified Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel MeKudash): This is the foundation of the Original Wisdom and it is called “Faithful Faith”. Its roots are AMeN. It is the Father of Faith, and from its power faith emerges.
The 3rd Path: The Sanctifying Intelligence
The third path of wisdom is The Sanctifying Intelligence. The third path of wisdom is the sephirot Binah in the Western Tree and Chakmah in the Hebrew Tree. The word “sanctifying” here means “to make pure, to set apart, to consecrate”, to “make holy”. What “sanctifies” or makes “holy” is the presence of the Divine in the Unlimited (the whole) and this presence prescribes the limits to the Unlimited. That which prescribes the limits is the Logos, and this is ultimately the Law of Necessity or the Divine Will. This is mirrored in the logistikon or the divine part of the soul. The prescribing of limits through the logos is not a setting apart that cuts off, but a site wherein and from where something commences and emerges as that which it is. For something to be that which it is is its ‘holiness’.
We began this commentary with a quote from Simone Weil: “Faith is the experience that the intelligence is illuminated by Love.” The intelligence is illuminated by the “amen” (“so be it”, “let it be”) that is the foundation of primordial Wisdom i.e., faith is the product of the acceptance of the Divine Will which manifests itself in Necessity. This acceptance is not an easy task as is illustrated by the fact that the first test or temptation of Christ is to turn stones to bread. This acceptance may be said to be a mastery of the appetitive part of the soul. This acceptance may also be said to rest in the concept of amor fati which is ‘the love of fate’. Only a few exceptional human beings are capable of this faith in its true form.
All of what we call knowledge is a product of Necessity. This knowledge is illuminated for us through Love, not only through the principle of reason. Here it is not the thing that is made ‘holy’, but the seeing itself that is ‘holy’ i.e., ‘set apart’, ‘made pure’. Fire is the element of purification. It is through our acceptance of the Divine Will that all things are made holy for us. The site wherein and from where something commences and emerges and becomes holy is the intellect (logistikon) when it is illuminated by Love. The truth, the unconcealing that is the root of faith, is the illumination of things, the bringing out of unconcealment, through Love. This is what we call ‘experience’. Experience is consciousness or awareness of, intelligence of some thing.
Since Chakmah is the “unlimited”, it cannot be known in any specific way. Binah separates and produces or brings forth particular things, makes them “pure”, sets them apart and “consecrates” them by giving a name to them. The giving of names to things is a “holy act”; it is what distinguishes and separates human beings from other animals and from other created beings. The type of thinking that separates and comes to know things through this separation is called diaresis in Greek. To bring things together, to unify them, is called dianoia. Binah is a combination of both types of thinking and brings about Understanding, how we come to interpret our world. This Understanding is the foundation of primordial Wisdom.
This third path is sometimes referred to as the “General Consciousness” which would indicate a connection to path #30, the third path on the upward direction of the Tree of Life, from bottom to top. (Path #30. General Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Kelali): “It is called this because it is the means by which the astrologers collect their rules regarding the stars and the constellations, forming the theory that comprises their knowledge of the Ophan-wheels of the spheres.”) Whereas the 30th path is in the realm of Asiyah, the 3rd path is in the realm of Beriyah. The 30th path is not the intelligence illuminated by Love. They are mirror images of each other. The knowledge which the astrologers have is knowledge of Necessity. Its source was geometry. The original knowledge of the astrologers was in their contemplation and attention to the movements of the heavens but it appears to have devolved into something else a long time ago (as is indicated by path #32 The Administrative Intelligence).
Diaretic thinking produces classifications, taxonomies. Though the world presents itself in multivarious particulars, the One is present within them, and this bringing together into a one is the thinking that is called dianoia. The “gathering together into a one” is one of the many possible translations of the Greek word logos. In philosophy, this is the problem known as “the one and the many”.
In Plato, one may see this problem outlined in the relation between the Ideas and the Forms. The Forms (eidos) are the outward appearances of things and these are innumerable. The Forms, however, are the emanations or begettings of the Ideas which are the essence of the Forms or what the things really are in their being. The Ideas of Plato are the Sephirot of the Sefer Yetzirah, and both have their roots in Pythagorean geometry. The practice of geometry was initially one of contemplation and prayer, a relation to the world as presence-at-hand. The “gathering together” that brings about our “understanding”, our interpretation of the world, is only possible through the logos. This gathering together can be done through the principle of reason or it can be done through Love. Both are matters of “seeing” and “viewing”. Both means are by ways of the logos. With the principle of reason, Love is absent or diminished; it is the lower form of eros, the thymoeides or “spirited” part of the soul. The requirement is to combine the Love that is Eros with the Logos that is the true essence of the thing in order to dwell in the proper relation with the Divine. This is done through the logistikon part of the soul.
Binah is the third Sephirot and is related to Understanding. How we come to understand the world is determined through Time and through Memory, and this is the influence of Chakmah and the element of water (material) upon that of fire (the mind, the head). Binah imposes limits on the unlimited of Chakmah; it gives shape to water. We might say that the ‘shape of water’ is what we call history. The philosopher Thales thought that all things are composed of water. Heraclitus opposed Thales’ view and asserted that all things were composed of fire.
Thales of Miletus
The limits which give presence to the things that are present have come about through the logos of number and word. Through the logos of number and word, we are able to de-fine things and to give them a name. The things become particulars, singulars, and they are separated from the whole of the things that are. This is why Binah is associated with “The Sanctifying Intelligence”. This naming and defining of things is considered “holy” in the Sefer Yetzirah, for it is our distinction as human beings from the other living creatures about us. Our ability to have a history and be aware of it through Memory is what is distinctive about us.
We might say that Binah is the recognition of three ways of viewing the world or the foundation of the three worlds: the world of ‘reality’ which is associated with Asiyah and the sephirot Malkhut (the material world); the world of history (historicism) which is a world with human beings at the centre and is associated with Yetzirah and Beriyah. The world of ‘virtual reality’ which is a discovery of modern times and goes beyond the real world as it is encountered creates a world within a world. We might consider ‘virtual reality’ a ‘second Cave’ which distances us still further from the truth of things. AI and its applications would be part of this ‘second cave’, a further distancing and closing off of our humanity from the reality of the Truth. That this intelligence is called ‘artificial’ is a recognition of its distance from the reality of things; it is an artifice or a making of human beings. This distance from things is the no-thingness at its height, and we must understand this as a blossoming of our nihilism in the modern age. (The four stages of truth in Plato’s allegory of the Cave correspond to the four universes of the Sefer Yetzirah.)
We can encounter the beings in our world as either “presence-at-hand” or “readiness-to-hand”. Present-at-hand beings are to be contemplated while ready-to-hand beings are encountered as something “useful”, something which exists in order to complete human beings’ tasks or goals. They are seen as “equipment” or “tools”. Human beings’ care and concern allows them to encounter beings as useful for ‘projects’. The things are manipulable, disposable. They are ‘for’ something. What the things are, their meaning, is determined by human beings’ projects and these projects establish and determine the worlds in which those things will appear and come to prominence. This is the meaning and significance of the Tarot card of The Magician #1 who, through the energy of his upward held wand, is able to make use of the cups, swords and pentacles that lie before him. The wand is a symbol of his will and energy. This will is associated with reason, Shin, the head. This will is the thymoeides or ‘spirited’ part of the human soul when it comes to domination.
In the modern view, ready-to-hand beings possess no telos or purpose of their own: their “value” is determined by human beings’ projects. Their particularity is replaced by uniformity. They are all calculable masses in motion in space and time. This was the revolution begun in the seeing of modern science (Galileo and Newton) as distinguished from the science of the ancients. In the virtual world, we can say that the logos has no ‘value’ of its own outside the projects that human beings have determined for it. Their “value” lies in their ‘in-order-to’, their relation to human beings’ projects. A project is ‘that which is thrown forward’ as the end or purpose in advance. Nature is ‘thrown forward’ and is ‘discovered’ or encountered as ‘environment’ in advance. We can look at a tree as ready-to-hand: its fruit, a shady place to rest, etc.; or we can look at its ‘presence-at-hand’: its colour, its bark, its DNA structure, but this manner of looking at the tree reveals nothing of the tree’s nature i.e., the tree as a living being.
Physis or nature, according to the Greeks, is “that which emerges and remains in view”. For Plato, every being conceals and discloses through its eidos or “appearance” at the same time: our knowledge and understanding of what appears to be is doxa or “opinion”. The wall of the Cave, the enclosure that is our created world, reflects shadows cast by the fire from the framework of the technites, the artisans, the powerful, within the Cave. This framework is ‘the thrown forward’, the shadows on the wall. Doxa and physis are in tension or strife with each other. Metaphysics, historically, attempts to “preserve” the concealing-revealing nature of the natural, what Aristotle called the “stable presencing”, (the meaning of the 15th path of Wisdom leading from Binah to Chesed), and this belief in the ‘stable presencing’ is shown in some of the paths of the Sefer Yetzirah.
In “The 32 Paths of Wisdom”, this attempt at preservation, of making something permanent, is sometimes called “The Constant or Settled Intellect” (Examples: Path #4: Settled Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Kavua): “It is called this because all the spiritual powers emanate from it as the (most) ethereal of emanations. One emanates from the Other by the power of the Original Emanator, may He be Blessed.”); “The Everlasting or Enduring Intellect” (Path #16: “Enduring Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Nitzchi): “It is called this because it is the Delight of the Glory (Eden). As it is, there is no Glory lower than it. It is called the Garden of Eden, which is prepared for the (reward of) the saints.”), “The Sustaining Intellect” (Path #23: Sustaining Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Kayam): “It is called this because it is the sustaining power for all the Sephirot”); and “The Continuous Intellect” (Path #31: Continuous Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Timidi): “Why is it called this? Because it directs the path of the sun and moon according to their laws of nature, each one in its proper orbit.”) Poiesis or ‘the emergence that remains in view’ is at the heart of causation (the bringing forth that is done through the logos as related to the four causes of Aristotle discussed earlier). Modern natural science’s view of nature, as a final view, secures permanently the distinction between the Good and Being, facts and values. There are no “moral facts” i.e., “natural morals”. This modern view is contrary to the world of the Sefer Yetzirah.
William Shakespeare
Human beings, as natural beings, bring themselves to presence; they “occasion” themselves from out of themselves. When Shakespeare says “the art itself is nature”, this would indicate that what he sees himself as doing in his dramas is analogous to “the blossom bursting forth”. The pen and ink and human beings are like the earth, air, and sun. Art is human beings’ revealing of the truth in the most appropriate way that they are capable of. The language of this revealing is “prophecy” or “art”, that language that is beyond time. This distinguishes this language from that of AI where language is understood as historical and algorithmic.
Binah manifests the interactions of the first horizontal line of Mem/Alef/Shin, the vertical double letter line of Peh, and the diagonal lines of Vav and Tet. The path of Peh does not interact with Tiferet; and because of this lack of interaction, how the natures of the paths will be expressed through Binah will come to determine how an individual human being will come to view their world; it will be their understanding of their world. Peh, meaning ‘mouth’, indicates the language of rhetoric, the language that directs itself to the passions and attempts to persuade the passions which have their root in Mem. Binah, as the Sanctifying Intelligence, has its roots in Shin, the purifying alchemical fire.
Two paths lead from The Sanctifying Intelligence to channel or communicate these emanations to the Sephirot below. The one path links the Divine to the human soul (Tiferet); the other path links to Gevurah or the “social” and this is what we would understand as traditional religion, our “shared knowledge” and understanding, and it is linked to Binah. Peh and Vav are these linking paths.
The Sephirot are what things truly are in their essence; the Sephirot are not in motion. Because they are not in motion, they can be said to have always been; they are eternal. The essence of all that has been made and all that will be made is continually present in the Sephirot and this essence is not subject to historical situations and interpretations, although these interpretations are all that can be given of them. This is referred to as parousia here, the “being alongside”, the “being present together”. Through the thinking that is dianoia, the essence of things is “revealed” and thus their “truth”. This “revealing” is done through Binah and its path to Tiferet, the Beauty of the world which is represented by the letter Vav.
The following passage from the Gospel of Matthew may illuminate this point: Matthew 11: 27:“All things have been committed to me (handed over to me) by my Father (the Good that is beyond Being). No one knows the Son (The Light which the darkness cannot comprehend, Tiferet #6) except the Father (the Good), and no one knows the Father (the Good) except the Son (the Light) and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him (the Good).” Notice that the revelation of the Divine is in the hands of the Logos and that this revelation is what is called Grace, the gift received from the Divine.
Binah is “the clothing”, the images and representations, by which the essence of things is brought into appearance and made visible; and through this visibility, we are given Understanding. Binah is the essence of the historical interpretations of things. This is its association with Time. Binah is the archetypal Mother, Nature, and her womb is the receptacle for the Seed that is the dynamis of being. She is the “matrix” and the khôra of Plato, what we might interpret as Space and Time. In Plato’s dialogue Timaeus, she is described as the receptacle in which all becoming takes place. The fires (the goods) that we see coming into being and being extinguished are just appearances, in the receptacle, of the Fire Itself (the Good). At 52b, Plato describes this receptacle as “space.”
The coming into being and passing away of things is Time. The coming together of Space and Time is the Law of Necessity, the Divine Will. Plato uses the term demiourgos or demiurge, the one who takes the pre-existing materials of chaos (Chakmah), arranges them according to the models of the eternal ideas (the Sephirot), and produces or brings forth all the physical things of the world, including human bodies. Demiourgos means “craftsman” or “artisan” in Greek, but it is something of a tricky word in its interpretation. The Greeks see the shaper of the world as a “manual labourer”, and so the relation of the demiourgos to Christ is somewhat apt since He Himself was a carpenter, the one who builds a “house” that becomes a “home” which aligns with the letter Beth. The associations of the ox and camel as beasts of burden also relate to this labouring, the labouring which produces ‘a work’.
The 13th Path: The Intelligence of the House of Influx/ The Unity Directing Intelligence
Path 13: Intelligence of the House of Influx/ Unity Directing Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Manhig HaAchdut): It is called this because it is the essence of the Glory (Beauty). It represents the completion of the true essence of the unified spiritual beings.
The Thirteenth Path is named the Uniting Intelligence and is so called because it is itself the essence of Glory (beauty). It is the Consummation of the Truth of individual spiritual things.
Alt. Trans. ” The thirteenth path is named the uniting consciousness because it is the essence of glory (Beauty). It represents the completion of the true essence of the unified spiritual beings.”
Wescott trans. The Thirteenth Path is named the Uniting Intelligence, and is so called because it is itself the Essence of Glory (Beauty). It is the Consummation of the Truth of individual spiritual things.
Case trans. The thirteenth path (Gimel, joining Keter to Tiphareth) is called the Uniting Intelligence, or Conductive Intelligence of Unity, because it is the essence of glory (beauty), and the perfection of the truths of spiritual unities.
The Letter Peh and the 13th Path: The Unity Directing Intelligence
We spoke in the Third path, The Sanctifying Intelligence, of the thinking that is termed dianoia, that thinking which unites things that are separated into a one, that thinking which brings things together into a one thing so that the thing can be seen and be named. The thirteenth path is the bridge between the universe of Beriyah and the universe of Yetzirah. Yetzirah along with Asiyah is the world of action, the formation of things which brings about their “consummation” or perfection, their completion. This formation and completion is related to ‘justice’. These things brought to completion may be physical things or ethical things, since “glory” (the beautiful) refers to actions and their results. It is the world of “values”, that which human beings ascribe to things of their own doing and their own making. “Values” are what human beings make or determine regarding actions or things; they are not the “good”. “Glory” is not the Good, though it is often mistaken for the Good. The Glory of creation is its beauty; the essence of the creation’s beauty is its relation to the Divine, the One, the Good. The light from Tiferet is here in action to bring about the relation between the Divine Unity and the individual things within creation.
The four causes of Aristotle which we spoke about are within both the physical and spiritual realms; that is, they have to do with both ontology and ethics. The actions which human beings take require a dynamis, whether in an active or passive form, a potential or a possibility of being able to come into being or not to come into being. In the Tarot, it is the card of The Chariot #7, although some Kabbalists ascribe it to the card of The High Priestess #2. This may account for the many similarities between the Priestess and the Chariot cards in their depictions. Paul Foster Case considers the Thirteenth Path to belong to the letter Gimel and to be associated with Tiferet; but this cannot be the situation. The letter Gimel refers to “wealth”, the “value” of created things, the multiplicity of created things, the “wealth” or “abundance” of things, and it is associated with the strife amidst that multiplicity of things. It is one of the 7 double letters indicating that its understanding can be viewed in two ways (at least). These two ways are the outward and downward path to Malkhut or the inward and upward path to Keter.
This strife among the created things and the urges that arise in human beings is that which needs to be brought into “friendship” or balance and this is done through the connection between the primal water of the Holy Spirit (Chakmah), the undifferentiated pre-conscious, to the fire of Keter (Shin) through Air (Alef) from which earth (wealth) is created. It is how one perceives this wealth of the earth that is key. The thymoeides part of the soul can assist the logistikon part of the soul or be be in conflict with it. this conflict rests in the desire of the thymoeides aspect of eros to possess and consume that which it perceives, while the logistikon wishes the soul to merely contemplate it.
The NOW is eternity once the individual has been reconciled to the One (Strength) which is the heart (Alef) of all things (Tiferet). This is how one can understand Plato’s statement that “Time is the moving image of eternity”, when eternity is experienced in the NOW. What is one to do practically i.e., in the way of action? One is “to mind one’s own business” and take care of those things that come to one when they occur: to recognize and distinguish between the Necessary and the Good and to prevent the worst from happening when one cannot assist in bringing about some good with regard to human affairs. It is not in our power to bring about the Good; that is in God’s hands. The greatest evils occur when we think we can bring about the Good i.e., “the good end justifies any means”. The greatest evils are perpetrated by those who believe that they are in possession of the Truth, and this evil is demonstrated on a daily basis in our being-with-others.
Religious proselytizing, for example, is an evil because it involves will to power. So much evil has been perpetrated by those who believe they possess the truth. To proselytize is to “expand”, and the proper response (according to the Sefer Yetzirah) is to “withdraw”. Christ’s instructions to his disciples to go out and “make disciples of all nations” is not that they should be “converted” through severity and fear i.e., through social and political action. One’s own actions are the tools of conversion; one “converts” by providing an example for others through their being-in-the-world, by “withdrawing” and “letting be”. This is the significance of the philosopher’s return to the Cave in Plato’s allegory. The history of the Roman Church is rampant with this sin, but Islam also partakes in this evil. Tolerance is lacking in those who believe they possess the truth. God Himself, as they understand Him, provides the example: if He is ‘the eternal fiery Father’ who demands subservience through fear, this is how the “converts” will relate to others. If He is the hidden God who loves in silence through the dark night that is existence, this is how His “converts” will respond. The seeing and understanding is all.
We spoke in the Third path of the thinking that is termed dianoia, that thinking which unites things that are separated, that thinking which brings things together into a one thing so that the thing can be named. The thirteenth path is the bridge between the universe of Asiyah and the universe of Yetzirah. Yetzirah is the world of action, the formation of things which brings about their “consummation” or perfection, their completion. These things may be physical things or ethical things, since “glory” refers to actions. It is the world of “values”, that which human beings ascribe to things by their own doing and their own making. “Values” are what human beings make or determine regarding actions or things; they are not the “good”. “Glory” is not the Good.
There are clearly errors in the commentaries that place Gevurah as “Justice” and not Hod. If the uniting intelligence is the essence of “glory”, then it must manifest itself in the Beauty of the world or in the “glorious” actions that human beings are capable of performing once they have been given the Love that unifies all beings. The glory that derives from “social prestige” is the second temptation of Christ. (Matthew 4:3) The unity or sense of oneness that one derives from belonging to a clan, country, political party or some other “collective” is a false form of the unity that belongs to “two or three gathered together in my Name”, what we have been calling dialectic here. His Name is Love, not the Law; it is not the power that derives from “social prestige” and recognition. Christ has no need to devolve into the ‘armed prophet’ of the Christian nationalists. He can look after Himself.
The NOW is eternity once the individual has been reconciled to the One which is the heart of all things. This is how one can understand Plato’s statement that “Time is the moving image of eternity”, when eternity is experienced in the NOW.
The emanations from Gevurah, which is on the pillar of Severity and Fear, are represented in the Tarot by The Hierophant #5 whose contrary is either The Devil #15 or The Tower #16. This is a crucial point in the Tarot and in the Sefer Yetzirah’s Tree of Life as 15 and 16 are at the very centre of the 32 paths. They occur at that point in the Tree of Life where there is a fork at Tiferet, one branch going East and one branch going West. At this point, a decision for the individual must be made (as is represented in The Lovers #6 card.) This branching of the Logos is indicative of the way West as the principle of reason as a principle of being on the Tree of Life. The branch East on the other hand indicates reflective thought, contemplation and prayer, the thinking that is moved by Love. The movement on the left branch or trunk is power and will to power, involving the language of public discourse (rhetoric) and technology as a way of being in the world. The movement on the right branch or trunk is self-nullification, the rejection of power (even though one possesses its potentiality and possibility), the dialogue among two or three friends (dialectic) and the sophrosyne and phronesis that is moral, ethical action.
The views and the seeing of The Hierophant #5 are to be contrasted with those of The Lovers #6 and can, in fact, be mistaken for The Lovers. The logos of The Hierophant is represented by Peh and it is the form of language that we call rhetoric, while the logos of The Lovers is represented by Zayin and Heh and these are what is known as the language of dialectic, the conversation between two or three friends. Below is an illustration of what is being said here:
The Hierophant #5 revolves to The Devil #15 i.e. the speech of rhetoric Peh becomes the way of seeing of the eye of Eyin ע through the hearing, the letters Reishר and Tavת corresponding to the right and left ear respectively.
The Hierophant #5 can also revolve to The Tower #16. In the Tarot illustrated here, The Hierophant is signified by the letter Vavו, while The Tower is signified by the letter Pehפ. The Tower is the Tower of Babel and represents an attempt to build a way to heaven through human will. #16 represents the middle point in the Thirty-two Paths of Wisdom and it is at this point that the Tree of Life branches off in different directions. These different directions are shown in the card by the 12 Yods on one side of the Tower and the 10 Sephirot on the other. I would allot #15 to The Tower.
The Devil card has been allotted #15 in most Tarot decks. The letter Ayinע or ‘eye’ has been assigned to it. The Lovers #6 has the letter Zayin ז meaning ‘manacle’ assigned to it. This seems to be an error. There are real manacles in The Devil card while there may be ‘bonds’ in The Lovers card. There are three figures in The Hierophant as well as in The Devil card. 10 + 5 = 15. There are two figures in The Tower card. One can be manacled by the Beast, the anti-Logos, or one can be bonded together or yoked together by the Daemon Michael (or Metatron). The torch of the Beast is about to ignite the tail of the male in The Devil card.
The Tower #16 is the card of revolution. The crown of The Tower of social prestige is blasted by the lightning bolt that is beyond the Sephirot shown in the right side of the card. I would reverse The Tower and The Devil cards in the Tarot deck in order to reflect their essential differences from each other.
The succumbing to the Great Beast is the succumbing to the three temptations of Christ: the material temptation of turning stones to bread (i.e. opposing the will of God and not recognizing the limits imposed by Necessity); the social temptation of power over the kingdoms of the world (desiring or possessing the power of “social recognition” or social prestige, the temptation of the collective); the individual temptation, suicide (the temptation of God by denying the will of God and the defying of the Law of Necessity). In the Tarot, the symbolism of The Devil mirrors that of The Lovers but is contrary to that of The Lovers: the manacles of The Devil are the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge in The Lovers. The manacles are attached to the cube of the physical world; no such cube exists in The Lovers card. The Devil represents a false or ersatz form of unity to which one becomes bound and loses one’s freedom and one’s individuality. This is why I would assign #16 to The Devil and #15 to The Tower. The Tower is the lightning bolt of Zeus, or of God, and is the nemesis for the worship of false gods or the worship of power and social prestige. In the ascending direction, the worship of The Devil leads to The Tower; in the descending direction, The Tower leads to that revolution or expansion which simply replaces itself with The Devil.
The Hebrew letter Peh means “mouth” and refers to the power of speech, but also to the taking possession of something and consuming it. In the collective, the social, the individual is “possessed” and “consumed”. I have associated the letter Peh with The Unity Directing Intelligence. In Kabbalah, speech as the Logos is a spiritual power, which can cause good or evil depending on how it is used. “A truth that’s told with bad intent/ Beats all the lies you can invent”, as the poet William Blake told us in his “Auguries of Innocence”.
What one thinks determines how one is in one’s being-in-the-world, and what one speaks has the power to become completed in action, just as the magic word “abracadabra” has the power “to create while I speak”. All speech is, in essence, the power of this “abracadabra”. Violent words and images lead to violent actions. The ethical is grounded in one’s way of being-in-the-world; the ethical is not the ‘values’ which are self-created and socially created, but is the presence of the grace which is the divine blessing which determines individual actions. One sees concrete examples of this on a daily basis in the humblest of human beings.
The quality of speech is the quality of the life’s essence and creative existence. This is why the care and concern for proper speech is so important to the being and well-being of human beings and why the destruction of speech through modern technology is so concerning with regard to our humanity as humane beings. The Peh teaches us to view our words as that which preserves our essence as human beings. Not giving speech care and concern causes us to become more bestial.
The shape of the Peh is a Khof with a Yod inside of it. More discussion of these two letters will be given below. The shape represents the spiritual spark of the Neshama soul, contained inside the physical body. With words and silence, we can communicate the essence of our soul and existence. This requires that the inner and outer life match – that the physical existence is fully aligned manifesting the spiritual intentions of the soul within it. As it says in the Talmud Baba Metsiah “Don’t say one thing with the mouth and another with the heart.” The Yod is also the Nekudah Sheba Lev, the point in the heart where spiritual awakening begins. Our attempts at the alignment of the physical with the spiritual level is the strife or polemos which is the essence of life.
The power of the Peh is a double-edged sword. As it says in Proverbs 18:21 “Life and death are in the hands of the tongue.” Because of this, the Peh represents the requirement to govern one’s own nature. Routine speech, speech to manipulate, all the distortions of speech must give way to viewing speech as a miracle. Then, speech can be used for its true purpose – to speak one’s destiny and to activate the spirit through one’s thoughts and speech.
Peh is similar to the letter Kaf כ in shape (it is a container letter) , but Peh contains a “tooth”; the letter Shin means ‘tooth’. In appearance, it bears some similarities to the letter Shin, although sideways. It is for these reasons that I have placed Peh above Kaf on the Tree of Life as both are double letters and thus vertical lines.
In Kabbalah speech, the logos, is a spiritual power, which can cause good or evil depending on whether it is used falsely or truly. Our being is determined by what one thinks and how one thinks, and these in turn determine our actions, what our character is and how one is. Since it is in the nature of human beings to reveal truth, what one speaks has the power to become reality. Lies become realities through false speech. Violent words lead to violent actions. When our speech is not used to reveal truth, we become more inhumane, bestial, violent, and insane. As Socrates said: “The opposite of knowledge is not ignorance but madness.” Madness is the stupidity of the social, the mob, the party, the clan. The quality of the speech determines the quality of the life’s essence and creative existence. This is why speech and language are so important and so dangerous, particularly in the West at this point in its history.
The shape of the Peh is a Khaf with a Yod inside of it or, as suggested above, a Khaf with a Shin inside it. The Shin represents the spiritual spark or the emotional, passionate fire of the soul, contained inside the physical body which is the Yod of our own being. Passionate speech deals with rhetoric; the speech before crowds and assemblies. With words and silence, we can communicate the essence of our soul and existence. This requires that the inner and outer life match – that the physical existence is fully aligned manifesting the spiritual intentions of the soul within it. Socrates’ prayer to Pan at the end of the dialogue Phaedrus expresses this: “Dear Pan, and all you other gods that dwell in this place, grant that I may become beautiful within, and that such outward things as I have may not war against the spirit within me. May I count him rich who is wise, and as for gold, may I possess only so much of it as a temperate man might bear and carry with him.” This is similar to what it says in the Talmud Baba Metsiah “Don’t say one thing with the mouth and another with the heart.” The Yod is the point in the heart where spiritual awakening begins. However, the alignment of the physical with the spiritual is no easy task as even someone such as Socrates needs to pray for a balance between them.
The letter Vav and the 17th Path: Intelligence of the Senses
The Seventeenth Path is the Disposing Intelligence, which provides Faith to the Righteous, and they are clothed with the Holy Spirit by it, and it is called the Foundation of Excellence in the state of higher things.
Alt. Trans. “The seventeenth path is called the consciousness of disposition. It provides faith to the compassionate (Khasidim) and clothes them with the Holy Spirit (Ruach Elohim). Within the Supernals, it is called the foundation of beauty (Tiphareth).”
Wescott trans. The Seventeenth Path is the Disposing Intelligence, which provides Faith to the Righteous, and they are clothed with the Holy Spirit by it, and it is called the Foundation of Excellence in the state of higher things.
Case trans. ·The seventeenth path (Zayin, joining Binah to Tiphareth) is called the Intelligence of Sensation (or, the Disposing Intelligence), and it establishes the faith of the compassionate, clothes them with the Holy Life-Breath, and is called the Foundation of Tiphareth in the plane of the Supernals.
Genesis 1.17 And Elohim set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness; and Elohim saw that it was good.
The Seventeenth Path is the awareness of or knowledge of Beauty or the knowledge of the senses, and I would relate this path to the letter Vav, the letter that makes conjunctions, connections, and relations for it is through seeing, through the senses, that we apprehend the world about us. It is the Kabbalistic indication of the statement of Simone Weil: “Faith is the experience that the intelligence is illuminated by Love.”
“Experience” is that knowledge which comes to us from our senses. When illuminated or lit by the fire of Love, this knowledge becomes ‘fire catching fire’ with the result that “faith” is produced (The Sanctified Intelligence #3). Through the viewing of the world through Love, care and compassion for the things that are begins. In such knowledge, one is “clothed” by the Holy Spirit or “holy breath”, Grace, and becomes loving and compassionate. This is true ‘inspiration’. This is why it is a “dispositional knowledge”. It is a knowledge governing our emotional dispositions as well as our mental and spiritual dispositions.
The knowledge produced by the senses does not give us an answer to the question “why”. The opposite of ALP (Alef) or “intelligence”/”knowledge” is PLA (“wonder”) and it is from “wonder” that “philosophy” begins. It is a knowledge that is “useless”, whereas the knowledge that comes about from “know how” i.e., reason and the will, is knowledge that is put to use to meet the ends that human beings devise.
Some commentaries say that to achieve such knowledge, one must be guided by The Hierophant; but it is clear that the true guide is the Mediator in the form of Eros or Jesus Christ i.e., Love. The Lovers card #6, has the mediator between the couple as the angel Raphael, (some commentaries say Metatron or Michael, and this would coincide with the ‘strife’ that is present at this point along the journey). The Lovers card implies a choice; and in this case, it is one between the head and the heart. The Fool #0, The Lovers #6, and Judgement #20 are all cards that imply choices and have a relation to the crossover paths of the Tree of Life.
The Hierophant is the representative of the ‘historical knowledge’, the ‘opinion’ or doxa that has been produced through reason and will to power and becomes the knowledge that is shared by those who dwell in the society which produces such knowledge. It is the knowledge that casts the shadows on the walls of the Cave that is Nature. It relates to piety and to what those in that society bow down to or look up to. Language creates the ‘worlds’ in which human beings dwell for it is what gives meaning to the things within those worlds. The Logos dwells in the human heart which is the ‘house of being’ of the individual, and from this dwelling a home may be built both within a world and among each of the inhabitants who come to share in the ‘making’ of that world. Relations and connections can be made.
17 And Elohim set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth;
In the passage from Genesis, we see for the only time that it is Elohim that “sets them” i.e., the sun and the moon, in the heavens to divide the darkness from the light. The Moon is associated with darkness (Chakmah, The High Priestess #2); the Sun is associated with the light (Tiferet, The Lovers #6). It is through the Holy Spirit (the Holy-Breath, Shin/Alef) that it is possible for the individual to experience direct contact with the Divine. This contact is called Grace. It is grace that allows the individual to rise up to the realm that is beyond the law and justice that is Necessity. Once again, the action of Elohim, the setting of the light that is the Sun and Moon, which is mirrored by human beings in their choices regarding the viewing of their worlds, for it is the light and the truth that is revealed by the reflected light of the moon or the direct light of the sun that will determine, “set”, what will be meaningful and how it will be meaningful for human beings in their worlds.
In the Scholastic philosophy of The Middle Ages, it was the concept of “intuition” which included the “consciousness” of and “intelligence” of something. This “intuition” was the parousia of God, the having God present, and this was considered the highest form of human being, that human excellence that was defined as ‘virtue’. The “intuitional disposition” no longer looks beyond itself to be fulfilled (this is indicated in the Strength card #11 of the Tarot). The contrary of this experience is the Absolute Knowledge of Hegel and Marxists.
The Beauty of the World is the covenant of God. It is always present (NOW) and given to all human beings at all times. In most commentaries on the Sefer Yetzirah, it descends through Binah from Chalkmah and Keter. This is the zigzag shape, or rather the gyring shape as I suggest here, of the paths and their ascent or descent on the Tree of Life.
The Holy Spirit (Logos) combines the elements of water, air, and fire as is shown in the various depictions and symbols associated with it. This would suggest that the pattern of descent is Keter through Chakmah, through Binah to Tiferet, through Netzach, to Hod, then Yesod, through to Malkhut. The pattern of the ascent would be Malkhut to Yesod, to Hod then Netzach, through Tiferet to Gevurah, to Chesed to Binah, from Binah to Chokmah, and finally to Keter. I would suggest that the initial descent is from Keter to Tiferet, for Chakmah or Space and Binah or Time are, were, and will be always present in the Creation of the Other from out of the One. For this reason, I do not ascribe paths to the original three Mothers of the primordial triangle.
The manner of our dispositions towards the world determines how we view the world and how we will act within it. Our dispositions change according to which of our many worlds we happen to be engaged in and they colour our worlds like the tones of a musical key: we may view the world in A minor or C major, for instance. We are happy in the world of our hobbies, for instance, while we are not so when we are engaged in the world of our duties on occasion.
The descent to Tiferet is not through Gevurah (as is said in some commentaries) but is directly from the primal Trinity of Keter, Chokmah or “wisdom”, and Binah or “understanding”. Genesis 1:17 relates to the establishment of Time: the solar and lunar calendars and of the “light” that separates from the darkness i.e., what we call history. History establishes Gevurah from which it gets its power and legitimacy; but this power and legitimacy or legality are effects of the Law of Necessity: the things bounded and limited by Time and Space. Space is prior to Time. With Time comes creation and human beings. “And Elohim set them in the firmament of heaven to give light upon the earth”.
Tiferet has the ‘breath of Elohim’: the Way, the Truth, and the Life: “No one comes to the Father except through me.” For Christians, Christ is the mediator between heaven and earth, mortals and gods (Daimons). The Ruach Elohim (the Holy Spirit) cannot descend from Gevurah or through Gevurah. It is the fire and air from Keter that is the pure logos. Gevurah is the “borrowed logos”, the “borrowed” word that is the text set in stone. This is why I have associated the path from Binah to Gevurah with the letter Peh פ.
“Willing” is the product of rational human beings (Shin is associated with the ‘head’). It is associated with some thing and directed towards some thing that we do not yet possess and that is ‘not yet’. Falsehood is understood as “pseudos”: the statements that are false in their synthetic structure of the things, their predicates (the imposition of limits from Binah). Truth is the ‘uncovering” or “unveiling” of the things that are. Falsehood is the covering up of things that are not. The narratives constructed by most modern societies are those created out of ‘falsehood’ and are necessary in order to cover up the truth by bringing to presence things that are not, the ‘shadows’.
Vav: Path 17. Intelligence of the Senses (Consciousness) (Sekhel HaHergesh): This is prepared for the Faithful saints so that they may be able to clothe themselves in the spirit of holiness. In the arrangement of the supernal entities, it is called the Foundation of Beauty (Yesod HaTiferet).
The meaning of the letter Vav is a paradoxical one in Hebrew. Vav is the power to unite everything that is separated in creation, and as the 6th letter of the Hebrew alphabet it is sometimes associated with Tiferet. But this power to unite is associated with the human will. In the letter Alef, it is the Vav which separates the Divine Yod from the individual yod. We have written earlier about the thinking that is dianoic thought from the Greek i.e., that thinking that takes the leaves, branches, trunk, roots of a tree and combines them into the one that is called “a tree”. Dianoia is the thinking of reason and it is based on the principle of reason. It is the thinking that controls the understanding of path ‘#13, The Unity Directing Principle, the path going from Binah to Gevurah.
Literally, Vav means “hook” or “peg” and the Hebrew letter is a vertical line ו. It represents the Kav, the vertical line extension of the barrier that separates the Creator’s perfection from the created world and its imperfection (remembering that the word ‘perfection’ here is understood as ‘completeness’). The Vav is the Law of Necessity which constantly directs the world, placing the limits upon the cycle of existence until the perfect Oneness of the Creator, which underlies all of creation, is revealed to those few who have been chosen to have it revealed to them.
Vav would thus relate to Shin as the purifying fire; this is an analogy to the very real world of human affliction and suffering. Vav is related to the Orr Yashar, the direct light of the Creator, entering the world and it receives this influence from Tiferet. This would relate it to Christ who is the direct light of the Divine and would thus associate Vav with Tiferet, the sixth Sephirot and the Beauty of the World. This is what is meant by its being “the essence of the Glory”. The bringing of things into “completion” as particulars so that they may be named is the essence of The Unity Directing Intelligence Path 13. It should be emphasized here that these are to be seen as social phenomenon.
As a connector, Vav contains the mediatory power to connect the will and the earth through the senses. This mediatory power is the contrary of that mediatory power that is present in Tiferet. As the Law of Necessity, the Vav can be considered a channel or canal, which connects the human will to the will to power that is the life-force that bestows all the energy of created things to the dispositions of human beings. It represents the ladder of Jacob Yaakov – rooted in earth, with its head in the heavens, what is known as Jacob’s Ladder, but the gyring motion considered here is an “expansion” i.e., the individual’s expansion of their will to power, their ‘empowerment’, and this puts the ladder on somewhat shaky foundations.
The Vav is the extension of the essential dot Yod י from which all of creation comes forth and which is contained in Alef, but it is the contrary and deprivation of Heh which emanates from Tiferet to Chakmah. The Vav is the crucial choice that is present in the Sephirot Tiferet regarding how we distinguish the Necessary from the Good. Whereas the Heh teaches us the private esoteric path to the Divine, the Vav indicates the public path that can be found in the worship of the collective, the social, what Plato called the Great Beast.
Vav represents the number 6 and represents the six days of the creation of the world, as well as the six physical dimensions (right left, front and back, up and down) of Space. The first day of creation is related to Chesed and is attributed to “kindness”. God’s withdrawal allows creation to be. The Light of God is two-fold: one Light is beyond Being (the Good) and then there is the light within creation itself from the sun, moon, and heavens. Creation begins at the number 4.
The second day of creation has the attributes of “severity”, “contraction”, and “judgement” associated with it. It relates to the Sephirot of Binah and Gevurah. The deprivation and need of the original creation is experienced here and its significance is the separation of the waters. It is associated with the Flood and with The Tower of Babel, The Tower #15 (as I would assign this number to The Tower).
The third day of creation is associated with Tiferet and is associated with beauty, mercy and the balance between the positive and negative elements of creation.
The fourth day of creation is associated with Netzach, with splendour and the victory that comes from endurance. It is also associated with the creation of the sun and moon.
The fifth day of creation is associated with Hod and has the attribute of acknowledgement but also of devastation.
The sixth day of creation is associated with Yesod and with the creation of human beings. It is associated with Adam whose name contains the letters Alef, Dalet and Mem. Adam is the human being who is perfect in his thought, speech and action i.e., he is the “complete” human being.
The Vav is also said to be representative of the male phallus, the fertilizing agent, bringing life, abundance, continuity, and addition and represents the extension beyond Tiferet to Yesod in the downward movement of the Tree of Life. The letter Vav in Hebrew serves as both a conjunction and a verb modifier from present, past and future tenses. It is thus associated with Time. Time is associated with Saturn, and Saturn is associated with The Devil #16 (as I would associate this number with this card) of the Tarot.
In the Book of Revelations of St. John, the number of the Beast is 666. I would attribute the giving of this number to the 6 in the realm of Asiyah. The Great Beast occurs in Bk. 6 of Plato’s Republic and is identified as the social, the collective wherein power is given to those who are able to predict the shadows that will appear upon the wall of the Cave. This is today’s modern science. The realm of the social is subjected to the same laws that operate in the Law of Necessity, and the power relations operating therein can be understood as analogous to gravity.
In contrast to the path of Heh which has the senses connected to the human heart, the path of Vav is connected to or through the human will, the human eye, and the human head. Through its connection with Binah, it establishes the human understanding of the things of this world. Because of this, the power of the sephirot Binah or Understanding is more predominant in the path of Vav than that of Chokmah or Wisdom.
Because Chesed receives the mercy and kindness that comes from its relation to Tiferet, the severity of the emanations deriving from Binah are not tempered or brought into balance by Tiferet’s effect on Binah. The shaping of the viewing from which the knowledge and understanding is experienced through the Vav is thus deprived of the direct light that comes from Tiferet and it is thus a reflected light. This reflected light is primarily determined by Memory and is the historical knowledge established through Time. This is the crossing over of the path of Vav with the path of Chet which has been discussed above.
It is said by some commentators that Vav is related to the Orr Yashar, the direct light of the Creator, entering the world, but if it is directly connected from Chokmah to Gevurah, this light would be a borrowed light, a shadow of the true Light. If these commentaries are correct, the Vav would be related to Christ who is the direct light of the Divine and would thus associate Vav with Tiferet, the sixth Sephirot and the Beauty of the World. The peg or hook would be the Cross of Christ. The whole of Necessity is the Cross of Christ and this Cross is the Divine Will. It is the Creation itself. The human body is this cross in microcosm.
As the connector or conjunction, Vav contains the mediatory power to connect the spirit and the earth, spirit here understood as Will as that which is behind the Senses. It can be considered a channel or canal, which connects and bestows all the energy or life-force, the Will to Power, of the shefa שפע the abundance from below up to the created beings and things. It could be said to represent that theoretical knowledge which historically came to dominate the understanding of the world, what is called metaphysics. It is rooted in the realm of Beriyah, and from this informs the formation of things in the world of Yetzirah.
The Letter Tet and the 15th Path: The Constituting Intelligence
15. Stabilizing Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Ma’amid): It is called this because it stabilizes the essence of creation in the “Glooms of Purity”. The masters of the theory said this is ‘the Gloom at Sinai’. This is the meaning of “Gloom is its cocoon”. (Job 35.9)
The Fifteenth Path is the Constituting Intelligence, so called because it constitutes the substance of creation in pure darkness, and men have spoken of these contemplations; it is that darkness spoken of in scripture, Job xxxviii. 9, “and thick darkness a swaddling band for it.”
Alt. Trans. ” The fifteenth path is called the constituting consciousness because it constitutes the essence of creation in pure darkness. According to masters of contemplation, this is that darkness referred to in scripture: ‘and thick darkness its swaddling band.'”
Wescott trans. The Fifteenth Path is the Constituting Intelligence, so called because it constitutes the substance of creation in pure darkness, and men have spoken of these contemplations; it is that darkness spoken of in Scripture, Job xxxviii. 9, “and thick darkness a swaddling band for it.”
Case trans. The fifteenth path (Heh joining Chokmah to Tiphareth) is called the Constituting Intelligence, and is so called because it constitutes creative force (or. the essence ofcreation) in pure darkness. According to masters of contemplation this is that darkness mentioned in Scripture: “Thick darkness a swaddling-band for it.”
Genesis 1:14-15 — “And Elohim said: ‘Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years; and let them be for lights in the firmament of heaven to give light upon the earth.’ And it was so.”
If path #4, The Settled Intelligence, is called this “because all the spiritual powers emanate from it as the (most) ethereal of emanations. One emanates from the Other by the power of the Original Emanator, may He be Blessed”, then the 15th path as the Constituting or Stable Intelligence is the knowledge or awareness of that from which the spiritual powers emanate. The 15th path refers to the substance or the physical material of the Creation, and this material substance comes forth from the darkness of the waters of Chokmah. It provides the balance, the yin and yang of the duality of the nature of Creation.
The Fifteenth Path is the path of the knowledge and intelligence of the substances of things, their essences as to what we think they are when a name has been assigned to them. It is that knowledge of the things that are concealed beneath the outward appearances of those things. On the other hand, this path could also be the error of that which passes for knowledge in the world in which we live in. It would then be the knowledge of the shadows or shades or that which passes for knowledge in the world of those committed to the empirical knowledge of things only, those committed to the world of “facts”. The ‘stability’ of this knowledge is subject to instability.
This knowledge is the product of the “reflected light” of Malkhut; it is not knowledge of the true light of Keter which descends to Tiferet through the letter Alef (although some commentators attribute this to the letter Beth which is one of the ‘doubles’ and so would imply two ways of viewing such a path). As such, this knowledge when it is associated with The Moon and The High Priestess of the Tarot, is not “true knowledge” of things. It is “opinion” regarding the nature of things. To try to make this clearer: with the withdrawal of God to allow His creation to be and the subsequent descent from the One to the Ten, there is the simultaneous creation of the movement upward from Malkhut to Keter. These movements are symbolically shown in the representations of the Sun and the Moon. The Sun is the original light while the Moon is a ‘reflected light’ from the light received from the Sun. The movement downward is the widening gyre of the paths; the movement upwards is the narrowing or focusing of the paths in the direction of the One.
It is through our thinking that we bring things to a “stand” by giving them boundaries and horizons and then by naming or defining them, making them specific. In the placement of boundaries and the naming, the thing comes to be what it is for us. But this is merely the shadow of the thing. The thing is able to be brought to a stand because there is the light that is the “reflected light” of Malkhut. The thing is able to stand in its permanence before us but its true essence remains hidden from us because it is “veiled”. It is the sides of the cube which we are unable to see.
The Fifteenth path is ascribed to the letter Heh by Case in the W.T., although this may be questionable as the letter Heh is the first “elemental” or singular letter, and it would appear that a double or one of the three Mothers is required here (perhaps Shin or Mem).I have assigned the letter Tet to this path, from Binah to Chesed, since the path crosses over the path from Keter to Tiferet but has no interaction with it i.e., it has no interaction with the Sun nor with the qualities that emanate from Tiferet. (Does the crossing over of paths indicate choices that have to be made or choices that have been made?)
In the Hebrew Tree, the 15th path is ascribed to the Sefirot Tiferet, and this could be possible if the Tiferet were not the Logos. In the Western Tree of Case, this path is the linking of Chesed to Gevurah in the Sephirot and between The Emperor #4, The High Priestess #2, and The Hierophant #5 cards in the Tarot. The High Priestess is not a “true” mediator in the Tree of Life, and so she is not able to bring into a relation The Emperor, a symbol of the phallic power of Nature, with the power of convention that is The Hierophant. The attribute of Loving Kindness which is ascribed to the Sephirot Chesed is not made possible by Chakmah, but rather Tiferet.Chakmah is the ‘cold, sterile Mother’. The linking, however, of The Emperor #4, The High Priestess #2, and The Hierophant #5 would indicate that which is taken for knowledge in the societies in which we live.
These two powers of Chesed and Gevurah are incommensurables, and are therefore placed on opposite sides of the Tree of Life. They are what are traditionally referred to as Nature and Convention. The true mediator between them would be Tiferet from the Hebrew Tree but such is not the case. What joins them is in fact the movements of the paths of what crowns The Devil #16 in the Tarot as is illustrated on the left.
The three paths proceeding from the Sephirot Chakmah are all masculine and this may indicate why the worldviews derived from this seeing or viewing of the world are all phallo-centric. Chakmah is the khôra of Plato, the receptable into which are cast the “seeds” or the Forms that will become, through the demiourgos, the Logos, the created things of the world. We moderns might refer to the Forms as the Archetypes that will give to the created things their “form” or outward appearance. (It appears to me that the attributes that Case gives to The Emperor card are actually those that belong to the Strength card. It is she who, like Hamlet’s Horatio, is able “to suffer Fortune’s buffets and rewards with equal thanks”. The Emperor is more suitable to the corporate organization that suffers the stock market’s buffets and rewards with due concern for its bottom line.)
Teth, the 9th Hebrew letter has a literal meaning of “basket” or “nest” and is the symbol of those goods טוב in creation that we sometimes mistake for the Good itself. It is also connected to the womb wherein the human being gestates for nine months so it is a “container” letter and is connected to the other container letters of the Hebrew alphabet. It is connected to the Womb of the World and so it is appropriately linked to Binah and to The Empress #3.
Tet has to do with purity and impurity, and is the teaching of how to distinguish between the Necessary and the Good, the sacred and the profane. This also relates it to the letter Qof ק. We have to choose the Good over those things that we call goods in our existence and which we consume as we live out our lives in Time. It is also the very difficult realization that even within the bad things that happen, the sufferings that occur out of Necessity, there is a hidden good which is beyond our comprehension.
While all of our knowledge comes from our understanding of the realm of Necessity, the Divine Will itself is inscrutable. To believe that we know what this will is is a great temptation to sin; it is blasphemy. However, the common belief in “the power of positive thinking”, which derives from the exercise of the will and provides many with solace in the face of the suffering of the innocent, is hardly an answer to this great mystery of Life. “The power of positive thinking” works with the imagination and the will and too often involves fantasy and a denial of the real world in which we exist. The real world must be confronted through faith.
Teth also represents femininity, pregnancy and is thus connected to Binah. It includes the kindness and mercy of creation and the principle that everything is eternal and nothing is ever lost. This same principle, that nothing is ever lost, is to be found in the stories and myths from all cultures throughout the world.
Teth’s essence is feminine, representing the number 9 for the 9 months of pregnancy, and is shaped like a womb, a spiral, a container where things change and transform (3 + 3 + 3). It is the “open region”, the field of manifestation of natural things, and is the essence of the feminine that contains all in her i.e., Nature. The infinite is contained in Teth and it brings about the finite.
This shows its relation to Binah where the unlimited of Chakmah is given limits through Binah. Truth in Hebrew is אמת (emet), and is spelled alef—the first letter of the alef-beis; mem—the middle letter; and the tav—the last letter. It indicates that the end is in the beginning and the beginning is in the end. This suggests the “completion” implied in both the natural and human making of things. Teth is a bridge between the worlds of Asiyah and Yetzirah, the making that is from out of itself (Nature) and the making that is “in another and for another” that is human making.
The Teth is that knowledge of good and evil that is with human beings from the beginning and is part of their nature. The suffering that is part of our strife in Necessity teaches us to distinguish between the good and the bad, and by choosing the good to clean and purify and thereby to do that which is impossible: to erase the bad deed that was done which was the sin of being born! This is the first step in the process of decreation. (This sin is the choice we make to be born). This illustrates that Tet is on the left side of the Tree of Life and is part of the upward movement that is the spiritual cleansing of the soul through the fires of Shin. Tet contains the principle common in all mythologies of the world that nothing is lost, nothing is wasted, and all is eternal; Death is a part of Life. The Teth is the container that creates the ability of Tikkun – that all souls are born to life with one purpose – to restore themselves to the Good as at the beginning.
Teith, or Tet the 9th Hebrew letter has a literal meaning of basket or nest, and is the symbol of the good טוב in all creation. Strangely, it also has the literal meaning of ‘snake’, and this may represent a sense of the hidden danger that may be present at its core. Tet has to do with purity and impurity, the sacred and profane (the influence of The Sanctifying Intelligence). It crosses the paths of both Beth and Chet within the Tree of Life as it makes its way downwards from Binah to Chesed, and may or may not be influenced by Tiferet in this crossing. Does it suggest that within the ‘appearance’ of being nurturing and caring, there is a hidden evil as this nurturing and caring can be an ersatz or false form of the true care and concern of the Divine. Since it is a ‘container’ letter like the letter Chet, it is an ‘enclosure’ and ‘surrounding’ or ‘womb’. Teith also represents femininity, pregnancy, and it achieves this through impregnating influence of the masculine Alef Beth.
Through the influence of Binah, Tet is the field of manifestation, the essence of the feminine Chakmah that contains all in her. The infinite or the permanent (being) is contained in Teith and it brings about the finite through the manifestation of the particular thing. The human desire for procreation is the desire for the Incarnation. Both Tet and Chet are container letters and, in this case, the ‘container’ is the human body. The contraries to the forces of Tet and Chet are to be found in the letters Nun and Zayin.
The Teith contains the Chesed (kindness and mercy) of creation, but it does so at the third level, and this might suggest that the ‘kindness’ and ‘mercy’ shown may be for manipulative purposes. The distinguishing between the good and the bad that occurs here it at the ‘conventional’ level i.e., it is determined by the societies of which we are a part and is a product of that learning that is historical. The dominant ethical and moral beliefs will be determined by the ideology that has become dominant in the society of the time i.e., capitalist or communist, fascist or libertarian. It is the narrative or the form that the logos has taken that matters.
Case links the Nineteenth Path to the letter Tet, ט and says that it is a horizontal link between the pillars of Chesed (Mercy) and Gevurah (Severity). This cannot be the situation since the Sefir Yetzirah assigns these three horizontal paths to the three Mothers: Alef, Mem, Shin; air, water, and fire respectively. Both the three vertical pillars of the Tree of Life (Jakim, Boaz and Beauty) and the three horizontal braces for those pillars (Air, Water, Fire) within the Tree belong to the three Mother letters, what we would call the vowels in English. The influence of the 19th path could be carried by this Mem/Shin/Alef crossover but it would be heavily influenced by Mem. The illustrator of the Tarot used here assigns the letter Tet to Strength following Case’s suggestions. The historical meanings assigned to the letter Tet do not seem to match those features that are characteristic of the Tarot card understanding of Strength.
If the Eighteenth Path of Chet deals with “gravity” or “necessity” and the downward movement of the emanations from the spiritual, then the Nineteenth Path deals with “grace”, the grace that allows for the upward movement. Upward movement is associated with Shin, the element of fire. This is the reason why it might be associated with the Strength #11 of the Tarot, for it is through Grace that she is able to tame the chaos that is the hidden world of the subconscious and the passions that dwell there, the bestial qualities of human being represented by the lion. Modern commentators, influenced by Freud, attribute this control to the “rational” content of the superego, and this is but one ingredient of the cup of poison that Freud bestowed on love and eros. The awareness, intelligence or consciousness of the ‘secret’ of all spiritual activities is that they are illuminated by a Love which is not blind. For Freud, Love is blind since it is a matter of chance.
The ’highest blessing’ is the Love of God disseminated through the Beauty of the world and the awareness of this love is given to us by the grace of God. The Beauty of the world is the mediator that gives this grace. It assures us of God’s covenant with us. It is “love” that is the ‘secret’ of all ‘spiritual activities’. Because it is ‘secret’, it is ‘hidden’ and so must be brought to light.
God, in His withdrawal from His creation, renounces “all power”; He Himself has made Himself subject to the laws that He has created, and we experience His withdrawal as absence or silence. His withdrawal is a metaphor, or the example provided, for the embodied soul that is the human being; we, too, must renounce the temptation to use the power that is potentially available to us. Our most potent example is suicide, the third temptation of Christ, where we have it in our power to tempt God to defy His own Will and to save us as we exercise our will. The Grace of God must traverse the entire expanse of Space and Time in order to be present for us in its true, direct form. Netzach is the terminus of the pillar of Mercy; the renunciation of power is what Mercy is all about. This principle is at the root of all that we call the ‘ethical’.
Desire is the erotic urge to fulfill a need: the urge may lead downwards to Yesod (sexuality) or upwards to Tiferet. Downwards is the illusion and mania of the Moon, while upwards is towards the Sun and the “harmony and friendship”, the “reconciliation” through Love i.e., The Lovers card #6. As Simone Weil said: “If we forgive God for not existing, He will forgive us for existing”.
While The Magician #1 is associated with will and power and the intelligence that manipulates the things ready-to-hand, Strength #11 is associated with the heart and its emotions and passions which she easily controls. She is Prudence and sophrosyne, the balance between mercy and severity, and thus she represents true justice, not the justice of the conventional laws written by human beings. Case goes so far as to say that it is The Hierophant (the emphatic representative of the superego) who teaches Strength how to tame the lion, but this appears not to be the situation. The Hierophant is too involved in the concerns of the physical, material world to be able to teach Strength anything; the Force and Power of The Hierophant is contrary to the force and power that Strength demonstrates. This is why Justice is correctly placed as #8, for in this situation Case would be correct in saying that it is The Hierophant who teaches Justice since it is The Hierophant who writes the Laws. But these laws are not what underlies the power of Strength. (This corresponds to the historical situation of the Church and the Papacy around the time of the revival of the Tarot during the Renaissance. There were plenty of reasons for early Tarotists to see the Papacy as The Devil (the Great Beast) and its future being the revolution of The Tower card which is what, indeed, occurred.)
The language of the Nineteenth Path is that of rhetoric, the written speech of the many (politics) and not the conversational speech of two or three friends that is dialectic. This written speech is represented by the letter Peh. The speech of The Hierophant or Gevurah is rhetoric; the speech of The Lovers is Tiferet, the conversation between friends.
The Self or the Ego is the greatest obstacle to unification with the Divine and this obstacle is represented by both the letters Tet and Chet. The Divine provides the metaphor for the true path for a human being: it is in withdrawal that the Other is allowed to be, and human beings are to mirror this withdrawal in their own selves with the decreation of the Ego and allow the Other and others to be. Needless to say, such withdrawal is not easy nor without suffering. One of the purposes of affliction in human life is the destruction or decreation of the Ego and the purification of the Self. This mystery is beyond most human beings (and it is certainly beyond me!) It can be said to be captured in Shakespeare’s play King Lear.
The knowledge of The Hierophant and Gevurah is the knowledge of the collective memory of the community. We are all products of this collective memory, and what we call knowledge and understanding (Binah) is associated with this collective memory both in its contents and methodologies (the influence of Chakmah). Again, it should be stressed that this knowledge pertains to the Law of Necessity, and we are reminded that there is a great chasm separating the Necessary from the Good, in fact nothing less than limits of space and time or the created things themselves.
To experience the grace of God requires that God cross over His creation to grant us this gift. The discoveries of modern science show us just how great this distance is. This knowledge that is the collective memory is what we call “history”. It is this collective memory which drives the will to power of the communities where it is venerated. The relation of such knowledge to “justice” has been discussed previously in this writing.
Genesis 1.6 And Elohim said: ‘Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.’
Genesis 1.21 And Elohim created the great sea-monsters, and every living creature that creepeth, wherewith the waters swarmed, after its kind, and every winged fowl after its kind; and Elohim saw that it was good.
The following chart shows the paths and their connections to the letters and symbols of the Tarot:
Card
Path
Letter
Meaning
Symbol
3: The Empress
Binah (Understanding) Path 3: The Sanctifying Intelligence: This is the foundation of the Original Wisdom and it is called “Faithful Faith”. Its roots are AMeN. It is the Father of Faith, and from its power faith emerges.
The imposition of limits upon the unlimited through the intervention of the Logos. This imposition is carried out through Shin whereas when the path emanates from Chokmah, the influence is from Mem.
Separate, enclose The thinking which provides limits to the unlimited and so makes particular things discernible. Distinction between the sacred and profane. The roots of faith are acceptance and submission to the will of God i.e., the Law of Necessity. Faith emerges through the power of the intelligence.
Path 14: Illuminating Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Meir): It is called this because it is the essence of the speaking silence (Chashmal). It gives instructions regarding the mystery of the holy secrets and their structure.
Shin/Alef/Memמש
“Speaking silence” is the beauty of the world which is the image of the absent God. Through the beauty of the world, the covenant of God is realized and from this realization the mystery of the hidden truth is revealed.
“Speaking” is the Word; its silence is that it is not uttered. This crossover path is what gives to Strength her quality of Grace, for it is the light passing through the Time and Space of Creation. It is through Strength (endurance, waiting) that we “hear” the Word of God.
Path 15. Stabilizing Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Ma’amid): It is called this because it stabilizes the essence of creation in the “Glooms of Purity”. The masters of the theory said this is ‘the Gloom at Sinai’. This is the meaning of “Gloom is its cocoon”. (Job 35.9)
Tetט
The Law of Necessity stabilizes the substance of Creation in the darkness of its purity. It is this darkness that cannot comprehend the Light.
Does the ‘dark night of the soul’ experienced by the saints and the mystics correspond to the ‘glooms of purity’ experienced prior to the revelation of the Word? Moses receives the Word of God at Sinai. The darkness of the world is the Cross of Christ, the Lamb slain from the foundation of the Earth. The gloom that is experienced as God’s absence, but it is a ‘cocoon’ meaning a period of metamorphosis, just prior to revelation.
16: The Devil:
Binah (Understanding)/ Tiferet (Beauty) Path 17. Intelligence of the Senses (Consciousness) (Sekhel HaHergesh): This is prepared for the Faithful saints so that they may be able to clothe themselves in the spirit of holiness. In the arrangement of the supernal entities, it is called the Foundation of Beauty (Yesod HaTiferet).
Vav The extension of the will to power beyond the individual yod to the collective. Link to Shin as ‘reflected fire’
Hook, Nail, Cane as an instrument of punishment, severity, fear? The wand of the Magician; the Devil’s torch in the card. The cubic shapes upon which The High Priestess, The Emperor, and The Devil sit or stand.
Connections, Secure, (the Social) Vav as that which makes connections without the mediation of Love. (Connection of the Beast as 666 since Vav is of the number 6 and is three levels removed from the Divine) The wand as a symbol of the will; the torch as a symbol of desire? Path is also called Intelligence of Dispositions, how the world will be viewed, the tonality of the viewing of the world (hearing of the Word). Relation to Eros as ‘two-faced’, fullness and need. The manacles binding the individuals are not tight.
5. The Hierophant
Binah (Understanding) Gevurah (Severity) Path 13. Unity Directing Intelligence (Consciousness) (Sekhel Manhig HaAchdut): It is called this because it is the essence of the Glory. It represents the completion of the true essence of the unified spiritual beings. substance from the Cause of Causes.
Pehפ
Mouth, speech. The need to consume. It is the language of rhetoric, the speech that appeals to the emotions, the appetites, the dispositions.
Historical knowledge, distinguished from the private knowledge gained by traversing the Nativot or private paths. The knowledge that comes to be “written in stone”. The knowledge associated with will and will to power as contrary to the knowledge that is gained by dialectic or conversation between friends. An ersatz form of friendship for there is no true mediation to make the two become one or the two or three hundred to become a One.
CHAPTER 6.1 In proof of these things, and witnessing faithfully are the Universe, the Year of time, and Man himself, the Microcosm. He fixed these as testimonies of the Triad, the Heptad, and the Dodecad; the twelve constellations as rulers of the world, the Dragon (THELE) Tali which environs the universe, and the microcosm, man.The triad, fire, water, and air; the fire above, the water below, and the air in the midst. The proof of which is that air is a participator (mediator) with both.
Alt. Trans.A proof of thisTrue witnesses in the Universe, Year and Soul.And a rule of twelve, seven and threeHe set in them the Tali, the Cycle and the Heart. 6.1 a. Tali, the Dragon, is above the Universe, as a king on his throne; the sphere in the year as a king in his State, the Heart of man as a king in warfare.And our God made the states of opposition (contraries), good and evil, good from the good, and evil from the evil. Happiness is reserved for the just, and misery for the wicked ones.
Wescott trans. 6.1. Three Fathers and their generations, Seven conquerors and their armies, and Twelve bounds of theUniverse. See now, of these words, the faithful witnesses are the Universe, the Year and Man. The dodecad, theheptad, and the triad with their provinces; above is the Celestial Dragon, T L I, (49) and below is the World, andlastly the heart of Man. The Three are Water, Air and Fire; Fire above, Water below, and Air conciliating betweenthem; and the sign of these things is that the Fire sustains (volatilizes) the waters; Mem is mute, Shin is sibilant,and Aleph is the Mediator and as it were a friend placed between them.
Commentary on Chapter 6.1
It should be noted that it is from language that the “emanations of the three Fathers” derives, or it is from the Word that the Holy Trinity is made manifest (“No one comes to the Father except through Me” John 14:6). An emanation is the effect produced by a cause and is a quality or predicate of a cause. Prior to the masculine is the feminine; and in the Sefer Yetzirah, the feminine is both Chakmah and Binah. It is from the water and fire that are the two sources of Chakmah and Binah that the physical universe is created through the mediation of air or spirit.
The physical universes are the “descendants” of these three primordial sources (causes). Water, Air and Fire are the three columns of the Tree of Life upon which rest the ten sephirot.
The Tali or Dragon may be said to be the Beauty of the world. The Tali are the arrows of Eros by which one is “entrapped” or “pierced” and drawn upwards. In Greek myths, Zeus is “entrapped” by the beauty of mortal women, then ravages them producing “heroes” and gods or demi-gods. The Tali is the centre of the sphere, the circle around which the heavens rotate. The Tali can also mean “to hang” and thus may be related to the Tarot card of The Hanged Man #12.
The interpretation of the Sefer Yetzirah rests on whether one understands the Incarnation as that which is destined for human beings, or whether the Incarnation is that to which human destiny is related. (In other words, the “salvation” is that which is destined for human beings or a human being is destined for “salvation” i.e., that is human beings’ purpose, meaning, end, completion, perfection.)
The Gate of Heaven – Bali
The Pole Serpent, Draco, has stars in all the constellations which represent Time and the twelve directions of space. The Dragon’s Head is the ascending mode while the Dragon’s Tail is the descending mode. The season of Spring is the head; Autumn is the tail i.e., the equinoxes. The Dragon’s Head is merits; the Tail is liabilities and this refers to pans of Justice in Chapter 2.1 of the Sefer Yetzirah. The Tali is called the Gate of Heaven for it is where the physical and the spiritual meet (through the presence of Air or Spirit) and is the beauty of the world.
Since Time is cyclic, the Cycle is “King over Time” i.e., it is the decree or Law to which Time is subjected. The Hebrew word used here is Galgal which means sphere or circle. The signs of the Zodiac in astrology need to be viewed as segments of a sphere. There are 22 letters which lead to 231 gates. The Tali are the lines within the circle (sphere) and thus are the paths or ways. These paths or ways are the experience of Time.
The Galgal is also associated with the voice of God as in a whirlwind. Whirlwind is Sufah (the “whirling dervish” of the Sufi-ism in Islam). The voice of God as a “burning bush” or sounding out of a whirlwind is related to the experience of the mystic who experiences contact with the spiritual as that of a whirlwind.
Other commentators on the Sefer Yetzirah place the Galgal beneath the feet of the Cherubim (the angels). The Galgal is the womb: the khôra of Plato in his Timaeus. The matrix that is the Universe has Binah as the mother and the galgal as her womb. The Galgal is the womb from which one is re-born to the spiritual plane (the sacrament of baptism as the re-birth through the fire, air and water of the Holy Spirit).
Time extends between Chakmah and Binah, but there is also the extension from Keter to Malkhut. Time is the Cross upon which the crucified Christ is hung and extended and this Cross reaches to the ends of the created universe. King Lear in Act 5.3 has experienced a rebirth through water and fire, and his ego or self has been destroyed through the affliction brought upon him by the tempest on the heath (the whirlwind). On the heath, Lear experiences the silence of God just as Christ did upon His crucifixion, and through fire and water is reborn. Many commentators and academics see the play King Lear as atheistic; Lear loses his faith in God. Nothing could be further from the truth. When he is reborn, he sees Cordelia as an angel. His reference to “becoming God’s spies” indicates that he and she will be at the Tali. The five “no’s” of Lear (Act 5 sc. 3) are not only his rejection of visiting Goneril and Regan, but also his rejection of the five dimensions of the universe.
The “Heart” is “King over the Soul”, and in the Sefer Yetzirah the soul and the body are often seen as the same. The word for heart relates to the number 32, the 32 paths of wisdom of the Tree of Life. The heart’s fire “catches” or beholds the fire that is at the heart of heaven. One reaches this fire by means of the 32 paths on the Tree of Life. The paths are the channels for the life-force that is the dynamis that is at the heart of nature, and this force is both how we make and how we “bring forth” things through the logos. It is “in-spiration”, the breathing in of the fire and of the spirit. The longing for the Good that is at the heart of all human beings is the “burning fire” in the darkness that experiences God’s absence and hears His voice out of the midst of the darkness (Eros).
In the circle to the left, the Heart is the radius or altitude. The Tali is the longitudinal axis. The Galgal is the circumference but also the horizontal or latitudinal axis. (The right-angled triangle of the Pythagoreans a2 + b2 = c2, when taken from the centre: Time2 + Space2 = Being2?) The three letters that come to make up the word “heart” mean “rejoice”, the attainment of truth as unconcealment. “The mystery of an other do not reveal” (Proverbs 25.9). The geometry of the Pythagoreans was a religious activity for the revealing of truth. It was a “religious” practice. It was meant to be an “occult” practice, not to be revealed to others. It was contemplation and prayer in their origin. Contemplation and prayer is meant to be done in solitude, not in public.
One of the more contentious elements of the Sefer Yetzirah is the possibility that evil is a product of God and was brought into being as a test for human beings. This view is part of the Gnostic tradition, part of the gnostic inheritance of the text. There is no “fall of man” in the Sefer Yetzirah; evil and the other contraries are present from the beginning. The Heart is King over the soul because it is as a king in warfare and must deal with the constant strife of the contraries that are present in everyday life and that are inherent in the creation itself. This understanding of heart has come to mean “will” in our psychology today.
CHAPTER VI6.1 In proof of these things, and witnessing faithfully are the Universe, the Year of time, and Man himself, the Microcosm. He fixed these as testimonies of the Triad, the Heptad, and the Dodecad; the twelve constellations as rulers of the world, the Dragon (THELE) Tali which environs the universe, and the microcosm, man.The triad, fire, water, and air; the fire above, the water below, and the air in the midst. The proof of which is that air is a participator (mediator) with both.
Alt. Trans.A proof of thisTrue witnesses in the Universe, Year and Soul.And a rule of twelve, seven and threeHe set in them the Tali, the Cycle and the Heart.
6.1 a. Tali, the Dragon, is above the Universe, as a king on his throne; the sphere in the year as a king in his State, the Heart of man as a king in warfare.And our God made the states of opposition (contraries), good and evil, good from the good, and evil from the evil. Happiness is reserved for the just, and misery for the wicked ones.
Wescott trans. 6.1. Three Fathers and their generations, Seven conquerors and their armies, and Twelve bounds of theUniverse. See now, of these words, the faithful witnesses are the Universe, the Year and Man. The dodecad, theheptad, and the triad with their provinces; above is the Celestial Dragon, T L I, (49) and below is the World, andlastly the heart of Man. The Three are Water, Air and Fire; Fire above, Water below, and Air conciliating betweenthem; and the sign of these things is that the Fire sustains (volatilises) the waters; Mem is mute, Shin is sibilant,and Aleph is the Mediator and as it were a friend placed between them.
Wescott trans. 6.2. The Celestial Dragon, T L I, is placed over the universe like a king upon the throne; the revolution of the year is as a king over his dominion; the heart of man is as a king in warfare. Moreover, He made all things one from the other; and the Elohim set good over against evil, and made good things from good, and evil things from evil: with the good tested He the evil, and with the evil did He try the good. Happiness (50) is reserved for the good, and misery (51) is kept for the wicked.
6.3 And out of the triad one stands apart; and in the heptad there are two triads, and one standing apart. The dodecad symbolizes war, the triad of amity, the triad of enmity, three which are life-giving, three which are death-dealing, and God, the faithful king, rules over all from the throne of his sanctity.One above three, three above seven, and seven above twelve, and all are linked together, and one with another.
Alt. Trans.Three Mothers: AMShAir, water, and fire.Fire is above, water is below,And air of Breath is the ruleThat decides between them.And a sign of this thing (?)Is that fire supports water.Mem hums, Shin hisses,And Alef is the breath of air that decides between them.
6.3cThree:Each one stands aloneOne acts as advocateOne acts as accuserAnd one decides between them.Seven:Three opposite threeAnd one is the rule deciding between them.Twelve:Twelve stand in war (strife),Three love,Three hate,Three give life,And three kill. Three love: the heart and the earsThree hate: the liver, the gall and the tongueThree give life: the two nostrils and the spleenThree kill: the two orifices and the mouth.And God faithful King rules over them allFrom his holy habitationUntil eternity of eternities.One on threeThree on sevenSeven on twelveAnd all are bound, one to another.
6.3bThe Tali in the Universe is like a King on his throneThe Cycle in the Year is like a king in the provinceThe Heart in the Soul is like a king in war (strife).
Wescott trans. 6.3. The Three are One, and that One stands above. The Seven are divided; three are over against three, and one stands between the triads. The Twelve stand as in warfare; three are friends, three are enemies; three are life-givers; three are destroyers. The three friends are the heart, the ears, and the mouth; the three enemies are the liver, the gall, and the tongue; (52) while God (53) the faithful king rules over all. One above Three, Three above Seven, and Seven above Twelve: and all are connected the one with the other.
Wescott trans. 6.4. And after that our father Abraham had perceived and understood, and had taken down and engraved all these things, the Lord most high (55) revealed Himself, and called him His beloved, and made a Covenant with him and his seed; and Abraham believed on Him (56) and it was imputed unto him for righteousness. And He madethis Covenant as between the ten toes of the feet−−this is that of circumcision; and as between the ten fingers ofthe hands and this is that of the tongue. (57) And He formed the twenty−two letters into speech (58) and shewed him all the mysteries of them. (59) He drew them through the Waters; He burned them in the Fire; He vibrated them in the Air; Seven planets in the heavens, and Twelve celestial constellations of the stars of the Zodiac. –The End of “The Book of Formation
Westcott’s Notes to Chapter 6:
This chapter is a resumé of the preceding five; it calls the universe and mankind to witness to the truth of thescheme of distribution of the powers of the numbers among created forms, and concludes with the narration thatthis philosophy was revealed by the Divine to Abraham, who received and faithfully accepted it, as a form of Wisdom under a Covenant.
49. The Dragon, TLI, Theli. The Hebrew letters amount in numeration to 440, that is 400, 30 and 10. The best opinion is that Tali or Theli refers to the 12 Zodiacal constellations along the great circle of the Ecliptic; where it ends there it begins again, and so the ancient occultists drew the Dragon with its tail in its mouth. Some have thought that Tali referred to the constellation Draco, which meanders across the Northern polar sky; others have referred it to the Milky Way; others to an imaginary line joining Caput to Cauda Draconis, the upper and lower nodes of the Moon. Adolphe Franck says that Theli is an Arabic word.
50. Happiness, or a good end, or simply good, TUBH.
51. Misery, or an evil end, or simply evil, ROH.
52. This Hebrew version omits the allotment of the remaining six. Mayer gives the paragraph thus:−−The triad of amity is the heart and the two ears; the triad of enmity is the liver, gall, and the tongue; the three life−givers are the two nostrils and the spleen; the three death−dealing ones are the mouth and the two lower openings of the body.
53. God. In this case the name is AL, EL.
54. This last paragraph is generally considered to be less ancient than the remainder of the treatise, and by another author.
55. The Lord most high. OLIU ADUN. Adun or Adon, or Adonai, ADNI, are commonly translated Lord; Eliun, OLIUN, is the more usual form of “the most high one.”
56. Him. Rittangelius gives “credit in Tetragrammaton,” but this word is not in the Hebrew.
57. Tongue. The verbal covenant.
58. Speech. The Hebrew has “upon his tongue.”
59. The Hebrew version of Rabbi Judah Ha Levi concludes with the phrase,“and said of him, Before I formedthee in the belly, I knew thee.” Rabbi Luria gives the Hebrew version which I have translated. Postellus gives: “He drew him into the water, He rose up in spirit, He inflamed him in seven suitable forms with twelve signs.” Mayer gives: “He drew them with water, He kindled them with fire, He moved them withspirit, distributed them with seven, and sent them forth with twelve.”
Commentary on Chapter 6:
Many of the points of this section of the text are repetitions of sections 2.1 and 3.4.
We need to view the triads as triangles with the “one” standing apart as the mediator which brings the elements of the other two sides together into a relationship of “friendship”. The triangles are embedded within pyramids. Above his Academy, Plato had written: “No one enters unless he knows geometry”. This might also be interpreted or translated as “No one enters unless he knows the mathematical” (originally meaning “what can be learned and what can be taught”). Like the Delphic oracle itself (“know thyself”), Plato’s “oracle” has multiple meanings. First, it could be understood as “no one enters unless he/she is capable of being a friend” and understands the principles of friendship, or no one enters unless he knows what is capable of being learned and what is capable of being taught. This capability of learning and teaching is knowledge of geometry and knowledge of geometry is the recognition of Otherness.
How is fire Binah “above” water Chakmah? “Above” could mean here the “boundaries” that apply the “limits” to the “unlimited”. Identity = water; Difference = fire. Water is the Other. It is the coming together of fire and water through the mediation of air that creates the physical universe. Air, the breath, the logos, joins them together. We would not be able to perceive things without the boundaries that provide the measurable quantities that differentiate the things from one another. The dualism of fire and water is mediated by Air so that the three become one through our simultaneous perception of them.
Water or Chakmah is “clothed” or shaped in Binah and so becomes the created things of our everyday world, the Other. The attributes of Chakmah are then revealed in Tiferet or Beauty or the Heart (other commentators see Chesed as this point of revelation and they ascribe the attributes of Love and Mercy to this Sephirot, but it appears to me that Love and Mercy are the very qualities which the Law of Necessity lacks or appears to lack.) The foundation of Chakmah ends in Yesod, the ninth Sephirot, which is the materiality of things which fulfill needs but are devoid of Beauty (?). Tiferet is directly linked to the light or fire of Keter. (This is discussed in much more depth in the commentary on the 32 paths of Wisdom that will be forthcoming.)
“Fire supports water” by providing boundaries, limits, “clothing”. Binah is Understanding which precedes Wisdom on the ascent. The “clothing” of Chakmah is our everyday experience of the world; it is the understanding which makes our ‘world’ possible. We know what plants are and how they are different from stones, etc. Understanding supports Wisdom and is the foundation for Wisdom. “Wisdom” is knowledge of the whole of things (of which human beings are not capable); understanding is knowledge of the parts.
From the preceding section of the text: Tali = Space = Fire; Galgal = Time = Water; Heart = Spirit = Air. A King = Malkhut (Kingship). The interaction of the King with his subjects is that of “above and below”. A King is not separable from his Kingdom. Space itself is not in motion. It is. The Heart is the axis of Space and Time, the spiritual and the physical. Space “lowers” itself by giving of itself to allow beings to be by providing an “open” region for the physical to become and exist (the “withdrawal of God”). The Heart is the king over the war and strife between space and time. This strife occurs in what we call the “present”, the “now”.
The “cycle of the Year” is time. “Time is the moving image of eternity” as Plato says. Time moves and is motion itself, but the mystery of Time and Space is that they are not in motion as they are eternal, or more properly sempiternal. They are the combination of Binah and Chakmah. Time and Space must be “clothed” in lunar and solar calendars, for instance. We know of the existence of Time because we get older. We know of the existence of Space by the Time it takes to traverse it, but these are only appearances, not the reality of Space and Time.
“The Heart in the Soul” shows us that good and evil are not opposites: evil is the deprivation (need) of the good. The “strife” in the soul is that between fullness and need; the Heart (Eros) “decides between them.” To see good and evil as opposites is to attribute evil to God (a blasphemy, therefore not possible) or to see God as not all powerful and He Himself is subject to the laws of the creation He has made. (Why does He not intervene in the “evil” that is a tsunami? Why is there the affliction of the innocent? This is the sin of believing that one can discern the will of God. It is the belief in Providence which is nothing more than the belief in the good fortune of Chance. “I survived the tsunami so God must love me”; “The tornado didn’t strike our house so we must be blest”).
To describe them as opposites does not measure the difference by degree. Obviously, there are some “evils” greater than others, just as there are some goods which are higher in order than my love for tacos, for instance. Just as there is The Good in which all other “goods” participate, is there not also The Evil in which all evils participate? The root of all sin is the sin against the Light: The Good – the Light – the Truth; and The Evil – the Darkness – the Concealed. (“The Devil’s greatest accomplishment is convincing the world that he doesn’t exist”, his ability to conceal himself. The play Macbeth is the play where the descent into darkness is shown most clearly: the motifs are themes in the play. Some people in the USA today and in other parts of the world who are willingly making this descent into darkness by ignoring or falsifying the truth. How this ignorance is coupled with evangelical Christianity is something that is simply beyond me.)
The Sefer Yetzirah seems to suggest that the good is not given as a reward, but it is a binding, a “yoke” to the good, what we would call a “covenant”, a promise that cannot be broken. To break it would be to sin against the light. A person attains that to which they attach themselves: “where your treasure is, there will your heart be also”; where your heart is, there also will be your treasure. (Christ’s admonishment to his disciples regarding the rich: “They have their reward.” That reward is usually in the “social prestige” that is attained.) The oblivion of eternity makes us choose false things as sacred, false things as good.
See Sefir Yetzirah 2.1 and 3.1. “Each one stands alone” 1 +1 + 1. The three ones can only become three when they are mediated by a one. Numbers are only possible when there is a material manifestation of the creation i.e., physical objects. Numbers only come into being or manifestation at three. Keter, Chakmah find a reconciliation in Binah or Understanding. Keter is the Light; Chakmah is the undifferentiated whole. When the Light (fire and air) combine with water, solids or physical substances are produced. The Fibonacci sequence of numbers illustrates this: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, etc.
The letter Phi was considered the letter of the “sacred mean”, “the golden ratio” in Greek. The “golden mean” is the ratio between the smallest and the next size up being equal to the ratio of the sum of the first two to the third. “Phi-lo-sophia” would then literally be the love of the sacred mean that gives wisdom, the friendship that gives wisdom.
Leonardo Da Vinci’s “Vitruvian Man” as well as the perfection of Greek sculptures and architecture, the “Doryphoros” and the temple of Apollo all make use of the “golden mean” to establish a relation between the macrocosm and the microcosm.
The reason the Sephirot can be used to make “pre-dictions” is that they speak in the language of poetic prophecy. Language is the original dynamis or movement in which being becomes manifest. Language involves letters, numbers and words. Is the manner or method here one of “divination” or theoria? Divination implies that one’s view of the whole depends on a dispensation of fate and cannot be derived from the theoretical viewing of the world which attempts to look for the immutable principles of the whole through reason and language. The whole of the Sefir Yetzirah is an attempt to show how, through language, truth and being have come into being.
1.6 These ten Sephiroth which are ineffable, whose appearance is like scintillating flames (like the appearance of lightning), have no end but are infinite. The word of God is in them as they burst forth, and as they return; they obey the divine command, rushing along as a whirlwind, returning to prostrate themselves at his throne.
Alt. Trans. These ten Sephiroth which are ineffable, whose appearance is like scintillating flames, have no end but are infinite. The word of God is in them as they burst forth, and as they return; they obey the divine command, rushing along as a whirlwind, returning to prostrate themselves at his throne.
Wescott Trans: 1.6. The Ten ineffable Sephiroth have the appearance of the Lightning flash, (17) their origin is unseen and no end is perceived. The Word is in them as they rush forth and as they return, they speak as from the whirl−wind, and returning fall prostrate in adoration before the Throne.
Wescott Note:
17. Lightning flash. In the early edition the words “like scintillating flame” are used: the Hebrew word is BRQ. Many Kabalists have shown how the Ten Sephiroth are symbolized by the zig−zag lightning flash.
Commentary on 1.6
St. John of the Cross
The vision or seeing of the Sephirot is like lightning, a flash that gives insight into the nature of created things. The Sephirot “burst forth” into appearance and then “return” into hiding, into “oblivion” or “forgetfulness”. The “bursting forth” is the Greek aletheia or “truth” and is here understood as “the word of God is in them”. Truth and language are related and intertwined with one another. To see the Sephirot is a “looking down” into the depths. (When the saints see Christ crucified, it is a looking down at Him on the cross i.e., St. John of the Cross, Teresa of Avila.) Since their appearance is like lightning, the Sephirot can only be visualized in an instant before they disappear. (Plato’s emphasis on the “correctness of the glance”. The meaning of the Sephirot can be misunderstood or misinterpreted. This would be quite contrary to Heidegger’s understanding of this phrase in Plato. The “correctness” that Heidegger criticizes because it gave rise to the need for certainty in modern metaphysics and the sciences is not what Plato understood as the necessity for “correctness”. Another type of thinking is involved).
The ten Sephirot as the emanations of the Logos are in themselves infinite. It is through the Sephirot, the 10 sayings of God, that all things come into being. (“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”) While created beings must come to be and pass away, the Sephirot themselves do not. The Sephirot indicate that whatever human beings or Nature makes or causes to come into being, it was always already there because the Sephirot are infinite. (From this, a more correct term for what we call “creativity” would be “in-spiration” – that which is responsible for the “breathing in” or the “giving life to” our forming and making of things, works of art, say. The things or works themselves were always already there.)
The “rushing and returning” indicates movement and rest. Aristotle’s dynamis as “possibility” or “potentiality”; kinesis or motion, movement; steresis or rest; energeia as completion or action at an end; entelechia the purpose or place (the stand, the topos of the thing) of something, the finished thing. Through all of these are “will” and “desire” understood as the dynamis, and these are related to the logos or speech and eros as ‘urge’. This is the moment of mystical vision, the moment when prayers are answered, the moment when the artist sees that which he or she is about to create . At these moments, we experience a re-birth or a change, an epiphany, which removes what were previous boundaries or limits to our being and we are able to rise up to the next level. This experience is that of the “embodied soul” as a Chariot, a chariot of fire.
The Text: 1.7
1.7 These ten Sephiroth which are, moreover, ineffable, have their end even as their beginning, conjoined, even as is a flame to a burning coal: for our God is superlative in his unity, and does not permit any second one. And who canst thou place before the only one? (Andbefore One, what do you count?)
Alt. Trans. These ten Sephiroth which are, moreover, ineffable, have their end even as their beginning, conjoined, even as is a flame to a burning coal: for our God is superlative in his unity, and does not permit any second one. And who canst thou place before the only one?
Wescott Trans: 7. The Ten ineffable Sephiroth, whose ending is even as their origin, are like as a flame arising from a burning coal. For God (18) is superlative in his Unity, there is none equal unto Him: what number canst thou place before One.
Wescott Note:
18. God; the Divine name here is Jehovah.
Since the Sephirot are embedded in a sphere, their shape and movement are circular. The end and the beginning are conjoined, yoked together. The ouroboros as the symbol of the infinite is seen within them. Beginning with Keter (Crown) and ending in Malkhut (Kingship), they may be seen as Cause and Effect: the Crown is responsible for (cause) the Kingship (effect), and the Kingship (effect) is responsible for, or obliged to, or brings about the Crown. (The placement of the Magician’s card at one may be questionable. Should he not be at 10? In the discussion of The Thirty-two Paths of Wisdom, I place The Magician at #10.)
The Wheel of Fortune, Necessity, would therefore be placed at 1, or prior to the one. The Magician as a Maker uses the ready-to-hand objects of the physical world (the wands, pentacles, cups and swords) to make the things that are useful to human beings. He is the techne, the artisan, the maker. The Wheel indicates the circularity of the movement: the movements within the Tree of Life, the paths, are not linear, but circular. They are present as arcs, incomplete in themselves? They are the wheels within wheels. Within the Wheel of Fortune card in the four corners are placed the symbols of the four Evangelists of the Christian Gospel, the “testimony” or speech that is the understanding of the whole.)
The analogy used is that of “a flame to a burning coal”. The flame is the cause of the effect of the coal’s burning and the coal’s burning is the cause of the effect of the flame. The flame, fire, rises upward; the coal, the earth, moves downward in the potentia of its dynamis. The two are conjoined. Within the five dimensions of the spherical World, Keter as cause and Malkhut as effect could be in different places with Malkhut above Keter. Keter is sometimes seen as “will” by the Kabbalists, but “power” or “force” would, I think, be a better interpretation of this word. There is a distinction between the Divine Will understood as Necessity, and the human will which manifests itself in the worlds of Yetzirah and Asiyah.
The Strength card, #11, shows no effort in controlling the passions or the “natural urges” within and without her represented in the figure of the lion. Is she exercising will or exercising power? Are the two related in Aristotle’s concept of dynamis? The Order of the Golden Dawn changed the original numberings of Strength and Justice from #11 to #8, but it is clear that The Magician #1 and Strength #11 are meant to be contrasted. Justice is represented as the “completed work” of The Magician energeia. The dynamis of the artist is present in The Magician whether he is forming the work or not. He can form the work and it is in this forming or performance that he is called an artist! But the potentia for the action, movement is present whether there is a performance or not.) The “will”, the choice, the decision is in the action itself; the “power” is present whether the action, choice or decision is performed or not.
If a pair of Sephirot are two points on an infinite line, the points come together at the “point at infinity”, the circular movement within the spherical. All lines or paths meet at “the point of infinity”, or the Heart, the centre of the sphere. Not to be involved in motion is to be at the centre of the sphere or wheel. Within the sphere, there are no opposites; there are deprivations. Evil is the deprivation of Good; poverty the deprivation of wealth; fullness the deprivation of need (Eros). The physical world requires space in order to be, an “open region” where it can manifest itself.
The spiritual realm is both within and beyond space: the soul is embedded in a body. The physical world is in both space and time. With the physical is time: being and time. The realm beyond the physical, the spiritual, does not require space and time. Angels, daemons, mediators are required to bring the realms of the physical and spiritual together. The flame of a candle cannot rise unless it is attached to something physical, the wax from which it derives or originates. Matter is our infallible judge. It is from matter, the physical appearance of the beauty of the world and individual human beings who happen to be in it, that we come to see Plato’s ‘fire catching fire’ as the effect of Love upon the flesh and the spirit.
In the spiritual realm, closeness is “resemblance”, kinship, friendship. The mediator brings two unlike things (such as two human beings) into a relation with each other so that they can resemble each other while remaining distinct individually: a:b:c, where b is the mediator between a and c bringing them into a relation. This relation exists on both the spiritual and physical levels.
The purpose of human being and of being human is to overcome the darkness of being, to bring being to light, to reveal being in its truth. The purpose of the Logos is to bring light to the world through life (eros), the light which the darkness cannot apprehend or comprehend. Both the darkness and the light are present simultaneously in human beings since we are embodied souls. The light is Love. The word for ‘truth’ in Hebrew is Emet which begins with the first letter of the alphabet and ends with the last letter. The two are joined together by Mem the middle letter of the alphabet. This suggests that the truth and the Logos are one and that this is Love (Eros).
On the Wheel of Fortune tarot card are the letters TORA (in a counter-clockwise direction) and the letters TARO (in a clockwise direction). This appears to indicate that one can achieve union with God either through the revelation of the Divine Law (Tora, the movement West), or one can achieve this same union through Being (Taro, the movement East). Judaism and Islam have their revelations of God given through the Divine texts of the Torah and the Koran, the Divine Law. Christians have their revelation given to them through the Being of Christ given in the testimony of the Gospels. Given the other principles in operation here, this would seem to suggest that the Torah and the Tarot are the Same (as Christ Himself suggests). The paths of the Tree of Life as Nativ or personal paths must be undertaken by the individual alone, whether it be in choosing to accept the Divine Law as revealed or by carrying out the journey by other means to find contact with the Divine Presence through personal experience. This experience is what has come to be known as Gnosticism.
Numbers do not come into being until the formation of the physical universe. For numbers, understood as arithmos, the numbers used to count, there must exist quantity and plurality. Prior to the formation of the World, there was only God, Chaos, and God’s Spirit hovering over Chaos, but these are to be understood as the Trinity of the One. With His withdrawal, the Other appears (the physical universe) and with the Other, number is brought into being. (Or number and language, the Logos, always existed in the Spirit; and with the withdrawal of God, come to presence in physical being? This would explain why the physical is necessary to reach the spiritual through the logos of number and language, and would thus account for the circularity of the Tree of Life and the spherical nature of World.)
The Text: 1.8
1.8 And as to this Decad of the Sephiroth, restrain thy lips from comment (bridle/yoke thy lips from comment), and thy mind from thought of them, and if thy heart fail thee return to thy place; therefore is it written, “The living creatures ran and returned,” and on this wise (regarding this) was the covenant made with us.
Wescott Trans: 1.8. Ten are the ineffable Sephiroth; seal up thy lips lest thou speak of them, and guard thy heart as thou considerest them; and if thy mind escape from thee bring it back to thy control; even as it was said, “running and returning” (the living creatures ran and returned) (19) and hence was the Covenant made.
Westcott Note:
19. The text gives only RTzUAV ShUB−−”currendo et redeundo,” but the commentators have generally considered this to be a quotation from Ezekiel i. 14, referred to H ChIVT, the living creatures, kerubic forms.
This verse of the Sefer Yetzirah is said to deal with techniques of meditation, the clearing of the mind of language and the representations associated with language (what we commonly understand as thinking and thought). The purpose of the mantras and the whirling of the dervishes is to clear the mind so that one may experience the Sephirot directly. The Sephirot are the revelation of the truth of the things that are in their shining forth, their epiphanic, lightning-like appearance. The appearance of the Sephirot is the cause of the “running of the heart” which, due to its failure (because it is bound to the physical), must return to the foundation of its physical base and to the representations of the mind through Understanding. It is Plato’s “fire catching fire”, the glimpse of the Love that is the Heart of the World itself and which, due to its relation as potentiality for love, is “caught” or yoked with the Love that is the mediator of the World. This mystical union is beyond thought or speech (hence the “bridling” and the “yoking”.)
The covenant made between God and His creation is that His redemption is promised even though one must return to the physical. A covenant is a “mean” which joins two “unequal” or incommensurate entities, in this case God and the individual soul. For human beings, communion with the spiritual is erotic, a need, and the possibility of this communion is promised in such a way that it cannot be broken. (“What God has joined together let no man put asunder”). Our sin is our breaking of our covenant with God; His promise is redemption from that sin. When we cease to desire the spiritual, we become less than human. The mediation that is the bridge between the spiritual and the physical is the covenant of God. This mediation or covenant spiritual is what we commonly understand as Grace.
The Text: 1.9
1.9. These are the ten emanations of number. One is the Spirit (Breath) of the Living God, blessed and more than blessed (holy, benedicted) be the name of the Living God of Ages (the Life of Worlds). The Holy Spirit is his Voice, his Spirit, and his Word.
Wescott Trans.: 1.9. The ineffable Sephiroth give forth the Ten numbers. First; the Spirit of the God of the living; (20) Blessed and more than blessed be the Living God (21) of ages. The Voice, the Spirit, and the Word, (22) these are the Holy Spirit.
Wescott’s Notes:
20. The Spirit of the Gods of the Living. RUCh ALHIM ChIIIM; or as R. gives it, “spiritus Deorum Viventium.” Orthodoxy would translate these words “The spirit of the living God.”
21. AL ChI H OULMIM; “the Living God of Ages”; here the word God really is in the singular.
22. The Voice, Spirit and Word are QUL, RUCh, DBR. A very notable Hebrew expression of Divinatory intuition was BATh QUL, the Daughter of the Voice.
Commentary on 1.9:
This verse speaks of the One as the Holy Trinity, the Word made flesh (earth). One is Air (Spirit), which is God’s voice, spirit and His Word. It is through the One that Wisdom and Understanding come about through number and speech, and it is from these that we have knowledge. This is the “Breath of the Living God”, the God’s presence in His creation.
Aristotle
On the Tree of Life, Keter (Crown) is the first number to come into existence. The Holy Spirit is the “gift of tongues” which manipulates letters into words and gives human beings the ability to name things and, thus, to bring them into being. For the ancient Greeks, human being was the zoon logon echon, the living being capable of speech/language. The “spirit” is the dynamis and energeia of Aristotle, that of living beings, their animation, motion and completeness. While things that do not have soul can achieve completeness, ensouled beings experience an absence, a need, of that which makes them complete. Human beings are the needing beings, and their existence is essentially one of eros, the strife of fullness and need. One could say that human beings are perfect in their imperfection.
The act of speaking, the formation of words and language brings the things of the world into being. The naming, through the word, brings the being to a stand in its place in space and makes discourse, communication about it possible. Keter, through Tiferet (Beauty) to Yesod (Foundation), brings about the Sephirot through which all things are experienced (Malkhut). “The beginning is in the end, and the end is in the beginning”. This must be understood as simultaneous, not chronological.
It is through God (Word) that we are able to name things. The naming of things is a “holy act”. His Name is “blessed and benedicted”. God “descends” to us and we “descend” (kneel in prayer) to Him. “Bene-dicted” is literally “the good speech”, the good word, both what is said and what is received; the prayer and its answer, the speaking and the hearing. God is the “Life of Worlds”. We live in a number of worlds simultaneously, but it is “speech” that is the “life” within these worlds and makes these worlds possible. Language is the sharing of these worlds with one another. With the erosion and disintegration of language comes the destruction of the possibility of these possible worlds and the movement towards a one-dimensional, surface oriented world. Modernity is the great example of the growth of this wasteland of one-dimensionality. This one-dimensionality is visible to anyone who travels the world at this time. Those things that are the products of technology have the Same at their core.
God is “the Voice of Breath and Speech”. To breathe is to in-spire and it is this in-spiration which gives voice its ability to speak. Breath is the mediator between voice and speech. The movement is from right to left from our point of view and from left to right when viewed from the Tree of Life. “In the beginning God created…” Voice; “The breath of God hovered on the face of the water…” Breath; “God said, Let there be light…” Speech. “Divine inspiration” relates to prophecy, “the highest speech”. Prophecy was the highest speech because of the predictive powers given to it by its comprehension of all time i.e., past, present, and future. The predictive powers of the modern sciences through mathematical calculation is now considered “the highest speech”. This can account for the Hebrew esteem of the prophets and the Greek esteem for the poets, for both spoke “the highest speech” in relation to their two cultures.
1.2 Ten are the numbers, as are the Sephiroth, and twenty-two the letters; these are the Foundation of all things. Of these letters, three are mothers, seven are double, and twelve are simple. (This translation of the Sefer Yetzirah is from Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan’s excellent text which can be found here: https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Sefer_Yetzirah.html?id=aqc-61vr4q0C&redir_esc=y )
Alt. Trans. Ten are the numbers, as are the Sephiroth, and twenty-two the letters, these are the Foundation of all things. Of these letters, three are mothers, seven are double, and twelve are simple.
Wescott Trans: 1.2. Ten are the ineffable Sephiroth. (9) Twenty−two are the Letters, the Foundation of all things; there are Three Mothers, Seven Double and Twelve (10) Simple letters.
Wescott Notes:
9. The Ineffable Sephiroth. The words are SPIRUT BLIMH, Sephiruth Belimah. The simplest translation is “the voices from nothing.” The Ten Sephiruth of the Kabalah are the “Ten Primary Emanations from the Divine Source,” which are the primal forces leading to all manifestation upon every plane in succession. Buxtorf gives for Sephiruth−−predicationes logicae. The word seems to me clearly allied to the Latin spiritus−−spirit, soul, wind; and is used by Quintilian as a sound, or noise. The meaning of Belimah is more doubtful. Rittangelius always gives “praeter illud ineffabile.” Pistorius gives “praeter ineffabile.” Postellus evades the difficulty and simply puts the word Belimah into his Latin translation. In Frey’s Hebrew Dictionary BLIMH is translated as nothing, without any other suggestion; BLI is “not,” MR is “anything.” In Kabalistic writings the Sephiruth, the Divine Voices and Powers, are called “ineffbilis,” not to be spoken of, from their sacred nature.
10. The classification of the Hebrew letters into a Triad, Heptad and Dodecad, runs through the whole philosophy of the Kabalah. Many ancient authors added intentional blinds, such as forming the Triad of A.M.T., Ameth, truth; and of AMN, Amen.
Commentary:
The Sephirot are not actual numbers but are the source of the numbers: that is, they are the source of the logos or, more properly, the logos itself. Sephirah means “counting” (or “counting on”). We “count” and “count on” the physical universe to ensure us that our knowledge of it is true knowledge. We begin to count with the fingers of our hands. We ‘count on’ those things that are ready-to-hand, things that we can touch and manipulate. Numbers are one of the ways in which we view, interpret and encounter things. Just as we view and de-fine things through words, we can also do so through numbers.
Number is not possible without the space and time of the physical universe for number must express itself in quantity and there is no quantity in one. Wisdom (Chakmah) and Understanding (Binah) lead to Knowledge, and Knowledge and Understanding lead to Wisdom. Wisdom is said to have 7 pillars which are the 7 subject or knowledge areas of study, “the seven pillars of wisdom”. Knowledge is the product of Understanding and Understanding is prior to knowledge. The link between Wisdom and Understanding is the Word, or the letters, and the link between Understanding and knowledge is also the Word which imposes limits on things and makes them particulars. We understand, for instance, the plant-like of the plant and the animal-like of the animal before we have knowledge of the particular plants or particular animals and through speech can name them and can point them out to others.
Space is prior to Time and the Sephirot are sometimes referred to as “the 10 Sephirot of No-thingness (space)”, the Ain. I write “no-thing” to distinguish it from the nihil which is our common understanding of the nothing. It is with Time that things come into being; and according to the Sefer Yetzirah, things come into being through the three books of text, number and speech which are mediaries between Wisdom and Understanding. Knowledge and Understanding must also be linked through the Word. Through the “naming” of things, things are given their place (topos in Greek) in space and so can be talked about. The world and its experiences and contexts that have been created is to be interpreted as “text”. We read the world or worlds in which we live.
The lines in the Tree of Life total 22: 3 horizontal, 7 vertical and 12 diagonals corresponding to the 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet. The 3 horizontals are called Mothers, the 7 verticals are called Fathers, and the 12 diagonals are called Simples. It is through the letters that the universe was created and they are called the 22 Foundation letters. It is through the letters that we come to understand and know the world.
The letters are not only involved in the inception of the world but they also sustain it. It is through text, number, and speech that the world is sustained and, as such, it is through human beings that “the way, the truth and the life” is sustained in the world since human beings are the only beings capable of speech. If one knows how to manipulate the letters correctly, one then knows how to manipulate the elemental forces and things of creation through the principle of reason. This relates to what the Greeks understood as techne, a knowing that involves a making (and what our word “technology” means today, and what is understood as yetzirah or “formation” in the text). This knowing and making is what artists and scientists do. This is but one side of the knowing that is present in the Sefer Yetzirah.
The three primary letters of the Kabbalah are א Alef (Ox), מ Mem (water) and ש Shin (tooth); and these are called the Three Mothers. They are the horizontal lines highlighted in red in the illustration on the left. Alef is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, Mem is the middle letter, and Shin is the second to last. The last letter (Tav) is not used because it is one of the Doubles (and thus would seem to imply a choice). The Doubles are illustrated in blue.
The three Mother letters are called “crossroads” because they are horizontal lines and cross over to the other side of the Tree of Life from left to right when viewed from the ascending motion or from the bottom up. They move from right to left when viewed in the descending motion, from top to bottom. (Notice that the Sephirot of Chesed and Gevurah are linked by the letter Alef which has passed through Tiferet initially. Chesed is Loving Kindness or Mercy, while Gevurah is Severity or Force. Chesed is what we understand by manifest Nature while Gevurah is what we understand by Convention. Tiferet is Beauty, and the letter Alef is in the centre of its name. It is the fire that is symbolized as the Sun. More will be said about this later.)
The twelve Simples or Elementals are illustrated in green and they are the diagonal channels of movement within the Tree of Life which are the netivot or private paths that one must traverse before one is able to ascend the Tree of Life.
The Sefer Yetzirah: 1:3
1.3 The ten numbers formed from no-thing are the Decad: these are seen in the fingers of the hands, five on one, five on the other, and over them (precisely in the middle) is the Covenant by voice spiritual (the Circumcision of the tongue), and the rite of Circumcision corporeal (as of Abraham).
Alt. Trans. The ten numbers formed from no-thing are the Decad: these are seen in the fingers of the hands, five on one, five on the other, and over them is the Covenant by voice spiritual, and the rite of Circumcision, corporeal (as of Abraham).
Wescott Trans: 1.3. The ineffable Sephiroth are Ten, as are the Numbers; and as there are in man five fingers over against five, so over them is established a covenant of strength, by word of mouth, and by the circumcision of the flesh. (11)
Wescott’s Notes;
11. The Two Covenants, by the Word or Spirit, and by the Flesh, made by Jehovah with Abraham, Genesis xvii. The Covenant of Circumcision was to be an outward and visible sign of the Divine promise made to Abraham and his offspring. The Hebrew word for circumcision is Mulah, MULH: note that MLH is also synonymous with DBR, dabar,−−verbum or word.
Commentary 1:3
While one has the plan for formation, for making something, through the understanding (the covenant of the spiritual or invisible word or voice), the formation itself occurs through the work of the hands. The covenant of the spiritual or voice is what we call “intelligence” or “consciousness”. The making of things occurs through the use of the ready-to-hand of the material things about us. Understanding is comprised of dianoic thought (the thought the brings or gathers separate things together into a unity or a one i.e. the logos) and diaretic thought (the thought that separates things to distinguish them from other things, how we classify things through our taxonomies). The manner of the seeing or how this covenant is interpreted or heard will determine whether one views the creation first through Love (Tiferet/Chesed) or whether one views the creation through Will (Gevurah/Tiferet), and this distinction is essential. These are the two faces of Eros and of the Logos.
The influence of the Pythagoreans on the Sefer Yetzirah can be seen in Aristotle’s, Metaphysics, I.5.986 a22, where he says: “Members of this school [the Pythagoreans] say there are ten principles, which they arrange into two columns of cognates (the pillars of Jakim and Boaz in the Tree of Life), thus: limited and unlimited, odd and even, one and many, right and left, male and female, rest and movement, straight and curved, light and darkness, good and bad, square and oblong.” The ten principles of the Pythagoreans correspond to the 10 Sephirot of the Kabbalah’s Tree of Life.
One of the puzzling things about the Tree of Life is the basic sense of direction given to it: do we determine the right and left from our perspective or should the Tree of Life be viewed in a mirror or from its own perspective which would reverse the directions given to it? I am puzzled because I am wondering how we can attribute Love (Chesed) as a Masculine principle (Aphrodite/Venus is female and the surroundings of The Emperor #4 card in Tarot are sterile i.e., they have no living nature about them) and the Masculine is placed on the right-hand side of the Tree which contains the five Loves, while Strength/Force/Will are attributed to the Feminine aspects and placed on the left side of the Tree of Life and are called the five Strengths? I will attempt to make sense of this puzzle as I proceed with this commentary.)
A covenant comes between two separate, unequal parts and holds them or yokes them together in a harmony; it makes them commensurate to each other. The covenant of the Spiritual Circumcision is the Parousia of God, the “being alongside”, “between”, “among”, that is the relation of God to His creation. The covenant is “the Lamb slain from the foundation of the Earth” for Christians, and the Ten Commandments of God or the Torah for the Hebrews. For the Hebrews, truth is revealed as Law; for Christians, truth is revealed as Being. The middle pillar of the Tree of Life is the place of the covenant. (This could be represented pictorially in the form of a cross as two diameters of a circle or sphere crossing in the centre).
In the Hebrew, the “circumcision of the tongue” is fluency in speech i.e., the highest speech, “prophecy”, the ability to pre-dict. We consider science as our “highest speech” because of its ability to predict outcomes and so we, currently, “bow down to” science. This fluency of speech is a gift through the mediation or parousia of God in His creation. Without this presence, we would know nothing. The two Cherubim on the Ark of the Covenant were said to be the source of all prophecy, but God is the third who speaks through the Cherubim who are the mediators: “There I will meet with you, and from above the mercy seat (Jakim, the ark cover), from between the two cherubim which are upon the ark of the testimony I will speak with you”. (Exodus 25:22) The two Cherubim on the Ark represent the two faces of Logos and Eros. When the Cherubim were removed from the Ark with the destruction of the First Temple, prophecy is said to have ceased to exist.
The circumcision of the sexual organ is the recognition that one can be empowered to have control over the urges that create strife in the human body and soul, one of the most dominant being the sexual urge. (This could be seen as an example for justifying the Strength card as #8 in Tarot since this is the step beyond the Chariot card and the strife between the two sphinxes represented in that card. The figure’s easily closing the jaws of the lion representing the passions would suggest this. The Justice card, however, suggests the need for control on the social plane, the higher demand to be just to each human being. It is the urges, the needs, that we have which create injustice in human relations. But they also create Justice…The Tree of Life seems to suggest that the individual is on the right side and the social is on the left side and there is the constant crossing over via the paths.)
The two covenants spoken about here would suggest the two faces of Eros and the Logos, the voice and the flesh, the spirit and the body, which shall be discussed in more detail as we proceed further into the texts of the Sefer Yetzirah and “The Thirty-two Paths of Wisdom”.
The Sefer yetzirah 1:4
1.4 Ten are the numbers of the ineffable Sephiroth, ten and not nine, ten and not eleven. Learn this wisdom, and be wise in the understanding of it, investigate these numbers, and draw knowledge from them, fix the design in its purity (“make each thing come to stand in its essence”), and pass from it to its Creator seated on his throne.
Alt. Trans. Ten are the numbers of the ineffable Sephiroth, ten and not nine, ten and not eleven. Learn this wisdom, and be wise in the understanding of it, investigate these numbers, and draw knowledge from them, fix the design in its purity, and pass from it to its Creator seated on his throne.
Wescott Trans: 1.4. Ten is the number of the ineffable Sephiroth, ten and not nine, ten and not eleven. Understand this wisdom, and be wise by the perception. Search out concerning it, restore the Word to its creator, and replace Him who formed it upon his throne. (12)
Wescott’s Notes:
12. Rittangelius gives “replace the formative power upon his throne.” Postellus gives “restore the device to its place.”
Commentary 1:4
Was God’s creation an act of will or an act of love? God in His withdrawal, His allowing something to be other than Himself, provides us with the perfect path or example for our own existence. (As the French philosopher, Simone Weil, once said: “If we forgive God for not existing, He will forgive us for existing”.) Is the withdrawal of the great artist from his work an act of will or an act of love? The artist can choose to withdraw or not; the artist can choose to bring forth that which inspires her or not. The common view is that it is an act of will rather than an act of love which brings forth great art; but an artist who withdraws through the will does not produce ‘great art’.
Both God and the Sephirot are “ineffable” and cannot be described through the use of language. But to see God as pure Will moves too close to Nietzsche for my liking (the eternal recurrence of the Same). The Sephirot are emanations of God and are, therefore, used to describe God. But God is beyond the Sephirot (Plato: “The Good is beyond Being”), just as the rose itself is beyond the emanation of its odour. The Sephirot themselves are inadequate representations of the Good. We could equate them with the “ideas” of Plato.
The Sephirot are one of the ways used to attempt to describe God, ways that human beings can comprehend the qualities of God or the predicates of God. All cultures attempt to describe God with the things that are ready-to-hand for them. God is One and ineffable. The attempts to proselytize the “true religion” without first learning the nature of the religion of those that one is attempting to convince that it is the “true religion” is akin to madness, an error and misunderstanding of the directive to “Go forth and make disciples of all nations”. A “disciple” is a “friend”, one with whom one can engage in friendly conversation i.e., dialectic. The proselytizing spirit should have been an exercise in communication and unification but, unfortunately, it was not. It became, and remains in most cases, an exercise in power, an exercise in evil.
This passage of the Sefir Yetzirah deals with the first three Sephirot: Keter, Chakmah, and Binah: The Crown, Wisdom, and Understanding. As discussed earlier, Wisdom is knowledge of the whole, which is difficult if not impossible to attain since we ourselves are part of the whole; however, this does not deter the quest for such knowledge, and as long as there are human beings, such a quest will continue.
Understanding precedes knowledge in that understanding is the sensory awareness of the presence-at-hand of things as well as their possible readiness-to-hand for ends that we determine. To make things stand in their essence is to reveal them in their truth. From this revealing of things in their truth, one passes from them to their Creator. One examines all things and determines which Sephirot relates to them (“Examine with them”). “Probe from them”: the Sephirot are not contemplated in themselves but are used to develop an insight into the things of the world. (Plato’s ideas are numbers, but they are not the numbers of arithmos or calculation. One uses them to gain knowledge of the things of the world and to recognize the things as “shadows”.) This “probing” brings a thing to a stand so that it will step forth and show itself as a “this” and not “that”. To let a thing be in its essence is to go beyond viewing the thing as something which is of possible use for our ends.
Here is thought understood as dianoia and diaresis, with knowledge as the outcome. The Sephirot themselves are reached through the “paths of Wisdom”; the paths are the “pure design” which is the product of Understanding (the limits placed on the Unlimited). The “design” is the Law of Necessity. The “examining” of things with the Sephirot is the determination of how the things in their essence belong to, or are possessed by, the Sephirot to which they belong or are possessed. The “probing” of things is the determining of the essence of the thing, the determining of the truth of the thing and the revealing of the thing for what the thing really is. This revealing “elevates” the thing from the shadows into its true reality. Examining and probing are part of questioning. This elevating of the thing is the “restoring” of the original Word to its Creator. We participate in the creation of the world by decreating ourselves by mirroring God’s act of withdrawal.
The four universes of the Sefer Yetzirah are: 1. Atzilut (Nearness, Emanation, the parousia of the Divine); Content: Sephirot; Level: No-thingness; 2. Beriyah (Creation); Content: the Throne (the Creation itself as the “lowering” of God, and the vehicle through which He expresses His care and concern through the Beauty of the world); Level: Something from No-thing, ex nihilo; the Sephirot of ‘no-thingness’; 3. Yetzirah (Formation); Content: Angels/Cherubim, products of the spirit, mediators; Level: Something from Something, “in another for another”; 4. Asiyah (Making, Action); Content: Shadows of the physical; Level: Completion (the work, the artifact, from dynamis potential to energeia the completed work). More will be said about the four universes later.
The Sefer Yetzirah 1:5
1.5 These Ten Numbers, (beyond which is the Infinite one), have the boundless realms, boundless origin and end, an abyss of good and one of evil, boundless height and depth, East and West, North and South, and the one only God and king, faithful forever seated on his throne, shall rule over all, forever and ever.
Alt. Trans. These Ten Numbers, beyond the Infinite one, have the boundless realms, boundlessorigin and end, an abyss of good and one of evil, boundless height and depth, East and West, North and South, and the one only God and king, faithful forever seated on his throne, shall rule over all, forever and ever.
Wescott Trans: 1.5. The Ten ineffable Sephiroth have ten vast regions bound unto them; boundless in origin and having no ending; an abyss (13) of good and of ill; measureless height and depth; boundless to the East and the West; boundless to the North and South; (14) and the Lord the only God, (15) the Faithful King rules all these from his holy seat, (16) for ever and ever.
Wescott Notes:
13. Abyss; the word is OUMQ for OMQ, a depth, vastness, or valley.
14. My (Case’s) Hermetic rituals explained this Yetziratic attribution.
15. The Lord the only God. The words are ADUN IChID AL, or “Adonai (as commonly written) the only El.”
16. Seat. The word is MOUN, dwelling, habitation, or throne.
Commentary 1:5
The text here deals with Space. God, the infinite One, is the “Former” (Yotzer), “the one who forms”. He is the Demiourgos of Plato’s Timaeus. The distinction between “formation” and “creation” is important. Here, the formation occurs within that which is boundless. The boundless is the “unlimited”, designated as the water of Chakmah, the khora of Plato’s Timaeus, that which is given limits so that it may be de-fined (“of the limits”) and designated as a particular thing. It is given shape. The boundless is given its limits through language and number, and it is through language and number that things come to stand as ousia, as presence in their particularity in the Now of Time. God as the Former is the Logos of the Greeks (“It is through Him that all that is comes into being, and nothing comes into being except through Him”. John 1: 1-5)
The three lower universes align with the ideas of “to create” (Beriyah), “to form” (Yetzirah), and “to make” (Asiyah). “Wisdom” is to create, “Understanding” is to form, and “knowledge” is to make. The making implies the completion of an action, the pro-duction of a thing such that the thing requires no further action and is complete; it is “perfect” in its emergence into presence.
The Sephirot #9 Yesod has connotations with “binding” and “connecting” and connects the physical world to the world of Yetzirah or the world of the formation which is associated with the angels or mediators, the daemons, and the human soul is considered one of these. It is through the mediation of the angels that the physical world is elevated or lifted up and restored to its Creator. The physical world is “brought to a stand” i.e., elevated, through the use of language and number. This is the covenant of speech. That Yesod is also associated with the sexual organs indicates its relation to the covenant of the flesh, circumcision.
(This is how the Magician #1 card of the Tarot is to be understood: he is not Keter or #1, but rather Malkhut #10. Through the formation of the ready-to-hand physical things of the world (the cups, wands, pentacles, swords), he elevates these things to the level of Yetzirah or “formation” through the mediation of Yesod which is the foundation, or base, of the physical world, what we understand as “metaphysics”. Yesod requires and is associated with sense perception and will (the sexual organ, the “lower” associations with Eros), and these are the initial “mediators” between the soul and the physical world.)
Space, within which the Tree of Life rests, is not a two-dimensional circle but a sphere. The sphere is divided into a five-dimensional continuum. Space is prior to Time, and Time as well as number begins with the being of created things, the physis of the world, its materiality. The infinite One (the Good) is beyond both space and time. The boundaries of space, the limits, are the realm of Necessity. They are indicated by the 10 directions within which space is given.
Three dimensions are “up/down”, “north/south”, “east/west”, and these three dimensions are further defined by the six directions of World as outlined. The Time continuum is defined by two directions, past and future, or beginning and end. This is called “year” and is the fourth dimension. The fifth dimension is the spiritual dimension and is defined by good and evil, and this is called “soul”.
To illustrate these dimensions within the sphere of space using the Tree of Life: 1. Beginning (Chakmah/Wisdom)/ End (Binah/ Understanding); 2. Good (Keter/Crown)/ Evil (Malkhut/Kingship); 3. Up (Netzach/Victory)/ Down (Hod/Splendour); 4. North (Gevurah/Strength)/ South (Chesed/Love); 5. East (Tiferet/Beauty)/ West (Yesod/Foundation).
God, called Elohim, creates the world with 10 sayings or speeches, which is the understanding. (Elohim is the Christ, the Logos, of St. John, but he is not limited to this manifestation only. He could also be considered to be Krishna or any other of the possible names that human beings have come to understand Him in their being-in-the-world). Wisdom as beginning represents the past. Memory is hidden, concealed until it is revealed or re-collected through the understanding (in words or images). The mediation of Wisdom (past) and Understanding (future) conceived as Time is the present. (“The future comes to meet us from behind” as the Greeks would say.) It is in and through Time that things come to be. Wisdom is the no-thing of Being which becomes the some-thing through understanding, through speech and number.
The centre line of the Tree of Life from Keter to Malkhut is called the “Tree of Knowledge”. On a two-dimensional plane, Keter is seen as closest to God while Malkhut is farthest. This is the traditional way of viewing the creation. The centre line is composed of 4 Sephirot: Keter (Good), Tiferet (Beauty), Yesod (Foundation), and Malkhut (Kingdom). (In The Lovers #6 tarot card, Adam stands before the Tree of Life while Eve stands before the Tree of Knowledge, if one wishes to interpret the figures in this way). In the direction of the descent, the Good proceeds to Beauty which provides the Foundation for Kingdom. When the direction is as ascent, Kingdom is the deprivation of the understanding to seeing the Foundation as the manifestation of the Beautiful and the Good.
Since World is a sphere (an infinite sphere? A sempiternal sphere?), the speaking of up and down as far as directions does not make sense. The Sefer Yetzirah speaks of depths. There is a great depth, a chasm, separating the Necessary from the Good. The depths are the “deprivations” of things. The depths are the “need” of things to realize their true substance and to come to their true essence which is their perfection. This possibility of perfection is always present within them. The human being is the ‘perfect imperfection’. Something is absent, missing. For something to meet these needs, a great depth must be crossed. The crossing is done in a series of steps or leaps. (What was understood as Jacob’s Ladder) For God to answer prayers, a great depth must be crossed, the whole of the created World itself, for God Himself is unaffected by His creation. He is beyond both Space and Time. Given what we know about the deep immensities of space, this crossing is not easily accomplished.
This is a supplemental writing to a larger “Commentary on the Sefer Yetzirah“. It contains thoughts relevant to an interpretation of the context of the Theory of Knowledge guide as given in its latest release, though those unfamiliar with the text of the Sefer Yetzirah or the Tarot may find some of its references difficult to follow. It may shed some light on the core themes as well as how knowledge, understanding and meaning are understood in the writings on this blog. It also sheds light on how I have come to understand the saying of Simone Weil: “Faith is the experience that the intelligence is illuminated by love.”
The concept of “world” used here is from the German philosopher, Martin Heidegger. Heidegger was an anti-Semite and a Nazi. Heidegger is the only great German philosopher who did not have a Protestant Christian background. Heidegger’s anti-Semitism was a product of the Roman Catholicism of the rural Germany in which he grew up. Heidegger’s “tragedy” is that he did not pay sufficient attention or give sufficient thought to the Delphic command to “know thyself”. Heidegger’s comments were that Jewish “rootlessness” caused them to be be, historically, without “world” i.e., that they were not human beings in the full sense but mere beasts. The Jews were not connected to the “blood and soil” that Heidegger saw as necessary to having a “world”. After the war, Heidegger was silent (for the most part) on the Shoah, but there are some notes he left behind that would seem to suggest that he was aware of the death camps and that he approved of them. What is being said about modern philosophy when its most consummate practitioner found appropriate political expression for his thought in the base inhumanity of National Socialism?
World and Meaning in the Sefer Yetzirah
Being the ‘perfect imperfection’, as human beings we desire to know the “reality” of whatever is, how it “is” as it is whatever it is, and the being of whatever has being. For the Sefer Yetzirah, as it was for the Greek philosopher Aristotle, “presence” (ousia) is what constitutes the reality of the things that are. Two questions predominate: what is the thing’s nature (essence)? what is its source (arche)?
In the Sefer Yetzirah, the study of the first question, the “what” question, is metaphysics. The study of the second question, the “how” question, is theology (“natural theology” as opposed to “revealed theology”, although these, too, are interrelated). For Aristotle, the nature of the being of the real is energeia. The ultimate source of the being of the real is “pure” or “perfect energeia”. Some thing is real if it is, and is some thing. For Aristotle, a thing’s form is its “ideal” way of being; it is what the thing is supposed to be.
We may compare Aristotle’s concept and that which is in the Sefer Yetzirah to the metaphor of the athlete and the ascetic: to athlon “the prize to be won in a contest”; athleo “to contend for the prize”. Contending for the prize requires that the athlete continuously work out in order to get in shape. Being an athlete requires being an ascetic, someone who constantly works to get in form or stay in shape. The Sefer Yetzirah is a training manual for the ascetic, and in this characteristic it shares a number of similarities with the writings of the Gnostics.
To apply the metaphor to the concept of “presence”: the only thing perfectly in shape is the divine, the ideal form. Everything else is striving for its ideal form or shape. To be real does not mean being in one’s form but becoming one’s form. Human beings are not yet in their finished form like a completed work of art. Human being is “still on the way” to a goal. With this view, “being real” can be still becoming one’s ideal form or already being it, either still moving to perfection (kinesis) or already at rest with one’s fully achieved self (stasis). In the Sefer Yetzirah, the ideal forms or shapes are the Sephirot, the Ten. The being on the way for human beings is the achievement of a unity or a harmony with the emanations of the divine that are the real as revealed through the Sephirot.
This unity or harmony is attained by human beings in a lived context within a world where things (such as the Sephirot) are encountered. A “world” is the matrix of understanding which is intelligibly structured by human interests and purposes. In this world of understanding (what is referred to as Binah in the Sephirot of the Sefer Yetzirah) beings become “meaningfully present” in the world of Yetzirah, one of the four worlds of the Sefer Yetzirah. Yetzirah means “formation”, although it is oftentimes translated as “creation”. In our modern context, it is the world dominated by that form of seeing, knowing and making that is called “technological”.
“The world worlds” i.e., contextualizes things, gives meaning to things found within it by providing the medium whereby they make sense. The meaningful and what it is is what appears in understanding and what allows it to appear. The meaningful is what shows up in the understanding of its meaning to human beings. “Presence” is not to be understood as a spatio-temporal “out there” but as what is “significant” to us, meaningful to us. The word parousia, so important in understanding the Sefer Yetzirah, is what means “near to our concerns though far away in distance”. This meaning is also to be considered with its other meanings of “between”, “alongside”.
What constitutes the meaning of things is the context of human involvement within which those things are met, the matrix of human purposes ordered to human interests and to human survival i.e., a world. This is the world of Yetzirah. Each human world discloses or unlocks the meanings that can occur to the things found within a world. A world discloses by providing a sense of possible relations in terms of which the things as they appear get their significance. In the language of the Sefer Yetzirah these are the ‘paths’ or ‘the gates’ that are travelled or met on the soul’s journey. (This is not to deny that the thing itself has its own telos or purpose outside of human involvement. This is dealt with in the discussion of the beauty of the world in another segment.)
Human beings live in many distinct worlds at the same time, but they are encompassed by the One world. A mother can make business calls from home while rocking her baby to sleep. Each world – her job, her parenting – has the function of providing the range of possibilities among the sense-making activities within its specific area.
You will note that meaning is to be derived in the lived world from the practical activities within that world. The Greeks understood this as praxis i.e., the activity of the parent, student, athlete, artist, and it is from these activities that one could attain “splendour” or “social prestige” through proficiency in the knowledge and skills required in those activities, the “know how”. “Know how” was called techne by the Greeks.
A world is any place wherein human beings live out their interests and purposes, the “relations” whereby the things within that domain get their meaning and significance. A world is a range of human possibilities in terms of which anything within that context can have significance. All such possibilities are teleologically (limited, possible of completion) ordered to human beings by way of fulfilling human purposes; however, in the perfection of their imperfection, human beings still hold a belief in the possibility of re-uniting with the Good wherein they will find their own “completion”. The world, the relational context which constitutes the meaning which is ordered by Love, is ordered to the final cause of human fulfillment that lets things in our everyday world make sense. This is the manner in which the relations between the Sephirot, the paths, and the gates are to be understood and interpreted in the Sefer Yetzirah. Meaning is given in the hierarchical order given to things in their relation to the Good. It is the Good which makes us give priority to our world of parenting over our world of business or the job, or to give priority to study rather than to merely whiling our time away in mindless pleasures and activities.
There is a fundamental difference between the meaningful thing and its meaning i.e., between any particular instance and its class, between a Sephirot and the thing or event it signifies, between the Tarot card and the experience it illuminates. Things do not come with their meanings built into them but get made as meaningful. Discursive meaning, meaning that is obtained by knowledge and reason and is able to be communicated to others, is a synthesis between distinct elements that are synthesized into a meaningful whole. Affirming that so and so is an athlete assumes that she does not exhaust the class “athlete” – she and the class are distinct – even though she can be identified, in a synthesis, as being a member of that class. In analyzing “world”, the structure of synthesizing and distinguishing (dianoia and diaresis) relates not only to the random acts of making sense (e.g., “She is an athlete” – an assertion), but also towards the world itself where such athletic acts are performed. Synthesis and differentiation (what Plato termed dianoia and diaresis) is the condition of all discursive sense-making. (See the discussion of Plato’s Divided Line in the Appendix to the “Commentary on the Sefer Yetzirah.”)
“World” is both static and dynamic, at rest and in motion. The world as static is the place of meaningfulness. Viewed dynamically, the world is the placing of things in meaning. This placing of things in meaning is done through the logos: contextualizing things within a set of possibilities that makes things able to be known and used in terms of their possibilities. “Being” as static is “presence”; taken as dynamic it is the “presenting” of things, the act of allowing things to be meaningfully present. This letting things be meaningfully present is done through Love acting as it does through sight which allows the things to be seen meaningfully.
The place where things become meaningful is in “the open that opens things up”. For Aristotle, “the soul” is the topos eidon, “the place where meaning shows up”. In the static world, it is the open field in which all forms of meaningfulness occur. (The Chariot card of the Tarot in the Rider-Waite deck, for example, is placed in an open field, outside the city.) In the dynamic world, this open area opens things up for possible use and appropriation i.e., makes them accessible and significant, lets them “be”. In Greek philosophy, the condition of “being open” indicates imperfection (the circle being the highest form and circular motion being higher than linear motion, for instance). Closure, self-closure upon one’s self would be the realization of all one’s possibilities, perfection, completion, accomplishment. This end is not possible for human beings in time. The meaning-giving-world is open rather than closed. It can never be fully known. Human being is always incomplete and finite.
Our “making sense” is always a partial synthesis for there is always an element of tension or “strife” in the area of “difference” and in the in-betweenness and mediation. Meaningfulness requires mediation (the logos) in order to make possible the relations that connect – these tools to that task, for instance. The pre-requisite for mediation is a medium, a field of possible relations within which the connections can be made. When static, the world understood as the logos, is the medium of intelligibility. In its dynamic state, the world as medium mediates tools and tasks (as well as subjects and predicates in language and reason) to each other with the result that sense or meaning occurs. The meaningfulness is never a perfect unity but always exists within a “strife” or tension.
According to Aristotle, what we understand as “freedom” is the power that “empowers” things in the static world to open themselves up to their various possibilities and potentialities. In the dynamic world, the “free” frees the things of the world and the power “empowers” their significance. In this world of Yetzirah, insofar as the world is one of relations between tools and their possible utility, language and number become the tools that are used to liberate those tools from their “just thereness” by revealing their suitability for fulfilling this or that purpose. For Plato, it is the Good that makes intelligibility possible, for it is the medium between the person’s ability to understand and the ability of the form’s eidos to be understood.
In the static presence of being, the opening is that region which clarifies things, the area of unfolding that lets them appear. Their emergence in this opening is a coming-forth or a stepping-forth. It is the light (love) which brings things to presence; but in order to do so, there must be an opening that allows the light in. In the allegory of the Cave in Plato, the opening is that of the Cave to the light of the Sun; the Cave itself is physis or Nature. In the dynamic state, the light brings clarity to things by letting light shine on them and show themselves as this or that. Aletheia or truth is the self-unfolding of the static world itself. The dynamic unfolding is the bringing of them into meaning. Physis is the world’s arising or self-emergence. In its dynamis, it is the emergence that brings things forth into the open where they can appear as this or that.
What is the source of meaningfulness? The open that opens things up through love (care, concern), the clearing that clarifies them, the ever-present presence that allows things their meaning is determined by what we think our “treasure” is. It can be the freedom that empowers (power itself for its own sake) or it can be the love of the beauty of “otherness” that enables the “letting be” of things to be as they are. In the Gospel of St. John, “In the beginning was the Word…” shows that Christ is both “world” and “word”, and as Love it is through Him that all things come into being. Things that do not come into being through Him are but “shadows”. One question that arises is whether or not the opening of world, the ontological movement of human beings that opens up the clearing for the parousia of being (Christ’s “presence” within the world), is a human doing or whether it is a receiving of a gift from outside of the human being, a gift from the God.
In Aristotle, kinesis or movement is “perfect” when it is a “self-possessed” movement: a thing is perfect or complete when it possesses its telos “wholeness”, “ownness” and it does so by being a finished work. Every entity is perfect to the degree that it has come into its own. The imperfect is what is still striving to fulfill its essence. We participate in a goal without fully possessing it. You speak some French even if not perfect French; you strive in your studies for “A’s” though you have not arrived there yet. Participation without full possession is deficient or a-teles, still coming into its own. Aristotle says “becoming is for the sake of Being”. The telos of the thing actively moves the thing. This is contrary to Plato who states that the Good is beyond Being and the Good is the telos of all Being and beings and moves all beings and Being.
Everything in Aristotle’s universe is either telic (reached its limits) or erotic (deprived, in need). When the thing is telic, it is wholly present informing and fulfilling the thing. When not, it is still drawing the thing from within, not to anything outside of itself, but towards its own fulfillment. Self-fulfillment is what Aristotle means by “the good”. The telos moves by being desired (the good). We are erotic creatures because self-fulfillment is what we long for. A moved thing is drawn on by its telos and human being is self-moved by its own desire for self-fulfillment. Human being is defined by its absence from perfection and is equally its erotic presence to perfection. Absence (relative but not absolute – deprivation – the desired telos) draws us to ourselves. Absence gives (lets be; allows for; is the source of) Presence. Our imperfect presence is the gift of the presence-bestowing-absence.
This ontological condition is shown in how we comport ourselves in our everyday dealings. Ari is studying for the IB Diploma: that is his raison d’etre at the moment. The Diploma is relatively absent yet but, as desired, gives Ari his presence, the world of meaning in which he currently lives, that of being an “IB Diploma student”. The absent Diploma which is desired but still unattained bestows presence. It gives world to Ari.
What kind of presence does human beings’ self-absence give? In the world of Sefer Yetzirah, becoming and perfection are paradoxically tied together. We may understand it in Plato’s words that “Time is the moving image of eternity”. The becoming that is Time is the absence of the perfection of God. God is perfectly perfect having always attained perfection being eternal. There is no becoming in God. God’s absence in His creation is to be understood as such: by withdrawing, God allows the beings to be in their presence. If there is no withdrawal, there are no beings since all would be perfectly perfect, a One. The telos for human beings then becomes unity with the Divine. In the world of Yetzirah, the wood for a table participates in its future perfection, but deficiently. It is still being moved towards its fulfillment, and once it reaches it, the movement of becoming a table will stop.
For human beings, the paradox expresses itself in that we are the perfectly imperfect creature in our incompleteness. Human beings can never attain completeness or perfection in the future because human beings are finite creatures i.e., in Time. Human being is always becoming a this or a that, yet it is always human being. It is itself “a moving image of eternity”. The difference between a table and a human being is that a table’s becoming will cease once the construction reaches its goal, whereas human beings’ becoming is directed toward the Good itself. The question is always whether or not there is such an end or whether human beings’ becoming is an end in itself. Whereas God is always whole and perfect and in a state of rest, his Creation is whole and perfect in its state of infinite motion. Human being is going nowhere because it is always where it is supposed to be, in its state of coming-into-its-own. For the Sefer Yetzirah, Adam is the first human being because he was the first being capable of discourse. Human being is neither progress over time (as in change of place, quality or quantity i.e., “evolution”), nor ontological transformation into something it essentially was not before (as in the case of substantial change). Human beings’ perfection is to be imperfect.
For the Greeks, reality is not only a matter of perfection (coming-into-one’s-own) but also a matter of “showing forth” and “appearing” – being present and accessible. Being and truth are interchangeable. The greater the thing’s degree of being, the greater its degree of meaningfulness in the double sense of its ability to know itself and others and to be known by itself and others. This “knowability” is the danger tied to “social prestige” as the illusion when the Good is mistaken and understood as Necessity.
Meaningfulness comes in different degrees at different levels of perfection. Human being is only partially knowing and knowable. For Aristotle, knowing is being one with that which is known. The erotic desire for the good is bestowed by its absence. For imperfect human beings, the degree of their presence to the relatively absent telos gives them their measure of knowing and knowability. The relatively absent goal, to the degree that it is desired, gives the moving entity its degree of ability to make sense of things. Human beings know mediately by bonding with the knowable in a matrix of mediating relationships. Human being makes sense of itself and others only by way of world (logos).
Insofar as human beings are imperfect, needing beings, that need is a longing and a desire for belonging even if there is nothing to belong to and no some thing else to long for. Human being (best depicted in the Tarot card The Chariot) is held in the strife between difference and synthesis, and human being is this strife. Human being is world – logos the zoon logon echon the living being capable of speech, thought. Eros pulls human being into its openness. As drawn out and opened up by its own need, its imperfection, human being frees things from the area of unintelligibility into the clearing and clarifies them, and the unifying of difference draws them into meaningful entities. When human being appears as what it is, it is not just the place where meaning appears but the very appearing of appearance, and is human being is capable of apprehending the source of meaning: the aitia, arche, and logos – the cause of, source of, and reason for appearance in the first place. This is its salvation. We are moved by eros (not ourselves: it is done to us) and in this moving world occurs. We are the always near but never arriving being.